Literature DB >> 22005185

2D MI-DRAGON: a new predictor for protein-ligands interactions and theoretic-experimental studies of US FDA drug-target network, oxoisoaporphine inhibitors for MAO-A and human parasite proteins.

Francisco Prado-Prado1, Xerardo García-Mera, Manuel Escobar, Eduardo Sobarzo-Sánchez, Matilde Yañez, Pablo Riera-Fernandez, Humberto González-Díaz.   

Abstract

There are many pairs of possible Drug-Proteins Interactions that may take place or not (DPIs/nDPIs) between drugs with high affinity/non-affinity for different proteins. This fact makes expensive in terms of time and resources, for instance, the determination of all possible ligands-protein interactions for a single drug. In this sense, we can use Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) models to carry out rational DPIs prediction. Unfortunately, almost all QSAR models predict activity against only one target. To solve this problem we can develop multi-target QSAR (mt-QSAR) models. In this work, we introduce the technique 2D MI-DRAGON a new predictor for DPIs based on two different well-known software. We use the software MARCH-INSIDE (MI) to calculate 3D structural parameters for targets and the software DRAGON was used to calculated 2D molecular descriptors all drugs showing known DPIs present in the Drug Bank (US FDA benchmark dataset). Both classes of parameters were used as input of different Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithms to seek an accurate non-linear mt-QSAR predictor. The best ANN model found is a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) with profile MLP 21:21-31-1:1. This MLP classifies correctly 303 out of 339 DPIs (Sensitivity = 89.38%) and 480 out of 510 nDPIs (Specificity = 94.12%), corresponding to training Accuracy = 92.23%. The validation of the model was carried out by means of external predicting series with Sensitivity = 92.18% (625/678 DPIs; Specificity = 90.12% (730/780 nDPIs) and Accuracy = 91.06%. 2D MI-DRAGON offers a good opportunity for fast-track calculation of all possible DPIs of one drug enabling us to re-construct large drug-target or DPIs Complex Networks (CNs). For instance, we reconstructed the CN of the US FDA benchmark dataset with 855 nodes 519 drugs+336 targets). We predicted CN with similar topology (observed and predicted values of average distance are equal to 6.7 vs. 6.6). These CNs can be used to explore large DPIs databases in order to discover both new drugs and/or targets. Finally, we illustrated in one theoretic-experimental study the practical use of 2D MI-DRAGON. We reported the prediction, synthesis, and pharmacological assay of 10 different oxoisoaporphines with MAO-A inhibitory activity. The more active compound OXO5 presented IC(50) = 0.00083 μM, notably better than the control drug Clorgyline.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22005185     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.09.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Chem        ISSN: 0223-5234            Impact factor:   6.514


  7 in total

Review 1.  Predicting monoamine oxidase inhibitory activity through ligand-based models.

Authors:  Santiago Vilar; Giulio Ferino; Elias Quezada; Lourdes Santana; Carol Friedman
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Exploring the anti-proliferative activity of Pelargonium sidoides DC with in silico target identification and network pharmacology.

Authors:  A S P Pereira; M J Bester; Z Apostolides
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Model for high-throughput screening of multitarget drugs in chemical neurosciences: synthesis, assay, and theoretic study of rasagiline carbamates.

Authors:  Nerea Alonso; Olga Caamaño; Francisco J Romero-Duran; Feng Luan; M Natália D S Cordeiro; Matilde Yañez; Humberto González-Díaz; Xerardo García-Mera
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 4.418

4.  Synthetic oxoisoaporphine alkaloids: in vitro, in vivo and in silico assessment of antileishmanial activities.

Authors:  Eduardo Sobarzo-Sánchez; Pablo Bilbao-Ramos; Maria Dea-Ayuela; Humberto González-Díaz; Matilde Yañez; Eugenio Uriarte; Lourdes Santana; Victoria Martínez-Sernández; Francisco Bolás-Fernández; Florencio M Ubeira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  SELF-BLM: Prediction of drug-target interactions via self-training SVM.

Authors:  Jongsoo Keum; Hojung Nam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An efficient computational method for predicting drug-target interactions using weighted extreme learning machine and speed up robot features.

Authors:  Ji-Yong An; Fan-Rong Meng; Zi-Ji Yan
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.522

7.  In silico prediction of drug-target interaction networks based on drug chemical structure and protein sequences.

Authors:  Zhengwei Li; Pengyong Han; Zhu-Hong You; Xiao Li; Yusen Zhang; Haiquan Yu; Ru Nie; Xing Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.