Literature DB >> 22004780

News and social media: windows into community perspectives on disinvestment.

Jackie M Street1, Sophie E Hennessy, Amber M Watt, Janet E Hiller, Adam G Elshaug.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study, in the context of disinvestment related health technology assessment, is to examine whether analysis of Web 2.0--commercial media output, blogs, and discussion forums--can provide an understanding of media framing, community perspectives, and the sociopolitical aspects of an entrenched technology.
METHODS: Thematic analysis of relevant data from fifty-nine media articles, thirty-nine discussion forums, thirteen blogs, and three Facebook pages relating to our case study: public funding for assisted reproductive technology services. Mainstream media and community-based social media responses were compared.
RESULTS: Media responses were narrow, primarily describing emotive individual narratives or the political nexus of interests. Community (including patient) responses were broader including discussion of opportunity cost and vested interests but mostly reflected the polar ends of the debate, diverging strongly for or against disinvestment from public funding.
CONCLUSION: Web2.0 and media analysis offers an inexpensive method to capture media portrayal, divergent community responses both to that portrayal and independent of it, and insight into the sociopolitical aspects of an entrenched technology undergoing disinvestment debate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22004780     DOI: 10.1017/S026646231100033X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  5 in total

1.  Disinvestment policy and the public funding of assisted reproductive technologies: outcomes of deliberative engagements with three key stakeholder groups.

Authors:  Katherine Hodgetts; Janet E Hiller; Jackie M Street; Drew Carter; Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Amber M Watt; John R Moss; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 2.  Depression and Anxiety Outcomes Associated with Failed Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adriana Milazzo; George Mnatzaganian; Adam G Elshaug; Sheryl A Hemphill; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Sustainability in health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 4: exploring opportunities and methods for consumer engagement in resource allocation in a local healthcare setting.

Authors:  Claire Harris; Henry Ko; Cara Waller; Pamela Sloss; Pamela Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review.

Authors:  Daniel J Niven; Kelly J Mrklas; Jessalyn K Holodinsky; Sharon E Straus; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Lianne P Jeffs; Henry Thomas Stelfox
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Health technology reassessment: the art of the possible.

Authors:  Gail MacKean; Tom Noseworthy; Adam G Elshaug; Laura Leggett; Peter Littlejohns; Joan Berezanski; Fiona Clement
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.188

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.