Literature DB >> 22004693

Phase 1 cardiovascular rehabilitation: be aggressive?

Vitor Oliveira Carvalho.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22004693      PMCID: PMC3215968          DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1749-8090            Impact factor:   1.637


× No keyword cloud information.

Background

It is well known that the most common respiratory complications after cardiac surgery are related to sternotomy, extracorporeal circulation and its inflammatory reaction [1]. Phase 1 cardiovascular rehabilitation is widely indicated to minimize the adverse effects of cardiac surgery, including respiratory function [2,3]. However, is there a critical day to physiotherapists? The study by Moreno et al [4] is very important and adds important information to what we know about respiratory function and physiotherapy after cardiac surgery. This study aimed to assess the pulmonary function in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery treated with a physiotherapy protocol. The authors showed that the day 3 after cardiac surgery showed the worst values of forced vital capacity, maximal inspiratory pressure and maximal expiratory pressure in the follow up of 30 days. However, the authors did not show data about the incidence of atelectasis and pulmonary complications along the follow up. The results showed by Moreno et al [4], raised some questions: should physiotherapists be more aggressive in the third day after surgery? If yes, could the aggressive intervention impact in lung complications and survival? This way, new trials are important to elucidate the best physiotherapy strategy in patients after cardiac surgery. Moreover, to investigate if an aggressive physiotherapy in the worst period of lung function after cardiac surgery decreases the incidence of atelectasis, pulmonary complications and improves patients survival.
  4 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Participants of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Processes, Structures, and Outcomes of Care in Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  J S Rumsfeld; S MaWhinney; M McCarthy; A L Shroyer; C B VillaNueva; M O'Brien; T E Moritz; W G Henderson; F L Grover; G K Sethi; K E Hammermeister
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-04-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Inspiratory muscle strength as a determinant of functional capacity early after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Ricardo Stein; Cristiano P Maia; Anderson D Silveira; Gaspar R Chiappa; Jonathan Myers; Jorge P Ribeiro
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Longitudinal evaluation the pulmonary function of the pre and postoperative periods in the coronary artery bypass graft surgery of patients treated with a physiotherapy protocol.

Authors:  Adalgiza M Moreno; Renata R T Castro; Pedro P S Sorares; Mauricio Sant' Anna; Sergio L d Cravo; Antônio C L Nóbrega
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  PEEP-ZEEP technique: cardiorespiratory repercussions in mechanically ventilated patients submitted to a coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Marcus Vinicius Herbst-Rodrigues; Vitor Oliveira Carvalho; José Otávio Costa Auler; Maria Ignez Zanetti Feltrim
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 1.637

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.