Literature DB >> 22003847

Antibiotic prophylaxis after uncomplicated ureteroscopic stone treatment: is there a difference?

Krishna Ramaswamy1, Ojas Shah.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the risk of development of a symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) based on the antibiotic prophylaxis given to a patient during and after uncomplicated ureteroscopy (URS) for urolithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent URS, laser lithotripsy, and stent placement for the management of stones from 2004/2005 (group 1) and 2009/2010 (group 2). We excluded all patients with preoperative positive cultures, preoperative antibiotics, urinary diversion, who underwent concomitant percutaneous nephrolithotomy, or had strings attached to the stents. All patients received a first-generation intravenous cephalosporin or fluoroquinolone at the time of initial intervention and had ureteral stents placed intraoperatively. Group 1 received an oral fluoroquinolone for 1 week postoperatively. Group 2 received an oral first-generation cephalosporin antibiotic peri-stent removal only. Antibiotics were appropriately changed according to the local resistance patterns. All stents were removed within 5 to 7 days. Our primary end point was symptomatic UTI.
RESULTS: After the exclusion criteria, group 1 had 48 patients, group 2 had 49. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of symptomatic UTI between the two groups; each group had one UTI (2% risk) (P=0.988). There were no cases of readmission, pyelonephritis, UTI, surgical reintervention, or Clostridium difficile. The UTI in group 1 was secondary to Escherichia coli and in group 2, Staphylococcus species; both were managed with oral antibiotics.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of oral peri-stent removal antibiotic prophylaxis is sufficient to prevent symptomatic UTIs in patients who have undergone uncomplicated URS for urolithiasis. The judicious use of antibiotics in uncomplicated cases may help lower the incidence of resistant organisms and other complications related to the widespread use of antibiotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22003847     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotic use and the prevention and management of infectious complications in stone disease.

Authors:  Daniel A Wollin; Adrian D Joyce; Mantu Gupta; Michael Y C Wong; Pilar Laguna; Stavros Gravas; Jorge Gutierrez; Luigi Cormio; Kunjie Wang; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in retrograde ureteroscopy: what strategy should we adopt?

Authors:  Cătălin Pricop; Carmen Dorobăt; Dragoş Puia; Martha Orsolya
Journal:  Germs       Date:  2013-12-01

Review 3.  [S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium].

Authors:  T Knoll; T Bach; U Humke; A Neisius; R Stein; M Schönthaler; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  A prospective randomized study to define the role of low dose continuous prophylactic antibiotics and anti-adherence agents in altering the microbial colonization related to indwelling double-J stents.

Authors:  Kumar Madhavan; Sanchit Rustagi; Rahul Jena; Uday Pratap Singh; M S Ansari; Aneesh Srivastava; Rakesh Kapoor; Sanjoy Kumar Sureka
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2020-08-24

Review 5.  Perioperative cultures and the role of antibiotics during stone surgery.

Authors:  Piruz Motamedinia; Ruslan Korets; Gina Badalato; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.