Literature DB >> 22003099

Finding the proper balance between freedom and justice: why we should not eliminate personal belief exemptions to vaccine mandates.

Douglas J Opel1, Douglas S Diekema.   

Abstract

Lantos and colleagues (this issue) propose to eliminate personal belief exemptions from school vaccine mandates, particularly for those vaccines that target deadly contagious childhood disease. They argue that not doing so would be unjust. In this counterpoint, we argue that, for reasons grounded in both health policy and morality, a just vaccine policy need not prohibit parents from claiming personal belief exemptions.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22003099     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-1496047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  4 in total

1.  Ready or not? School preparedness for California's new personal beliefs exemption law.

Authors:  Marissa Wheeler; Alison M Buttenheim
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Rethinking vaccine policy making in an era of vaccine hesitancy: time to rebuild, not remodel?

Authors:  Douglas J Opel; Edgar K Marcuse
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  To close the childhood immunization gap, we need a richer understanding of parents' decision-making.

Authors:  Paul Corben; Julie Leask
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Measles, mandates, and making vaccination the default option.

Authors:  Douglas J Opel; Saad B Omer
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 16.193

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.