Literature DB >> 22003053

Loss of the preconditioning effect of rosuvastatin during sustained therapy: a human in vivo study.

Andrew Liuni1, Mary Clare Luca, Tommaso Gori, John D Parker.   

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated that the acute administration of 3-hydroxy-3 methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors has protective effects in the setting of ischemia-reperfusion (IR). Previously, we demonstrated that a single dose of rosuvastatin prevented IR-induced endothelial dysfunction in humans through a cyclooxygenase-2-dependent mechanism. Whether the chronic administration of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors provides similar protection remains controversial and is unknown in humans. Eighteen male volunteers were randomized to receive a single dose of rosuvastatin (20 mg) or placebo. Twenty-four hours later, endothelium-dependent, radial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was measured before and after IR (15 min of upper arm ischemia followed by 15 min of reperfusion). In a separate protocol, 30 healthy volunteers were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive oral rosuvastatin (20 mg/day) and placebo, rosuvastatin, and celecoxib (100 mg bid) or placebo alone, all for 21 days. Twenty-four hours after the final administration of study medication, FMD was measured before and after IR. Pre-IR FMD was similar between groups in both protocols. In the acute administration protocol, rosuvastatin significantly prevented the blunting of FMD associated with IR (FMD pre-IR: 8.4 ± 1.3%; post-IR: 6.2 ± 1.3%; P = 0.01 ANOVA, treatment group interaction). In the daily administration protocol, IR significantly blunted FMD in the placebo group (FMD pre-IR: 7.5 ± 0.9%; post-IR: 3.3 ± 0.7%; P < 0.001). Chronic treatment with rosuvastatin did not modify this ischemic injury (FMD pre-IR: 6.9 ± 0.4%; post-IR: 1.6 ± 1.0%; P < 0.001; P = NS ANOVA, treatment group interaction). Similarly, FMD responses post-IR in volunteers receiving rosuvastatin and celecoxib did not significantly differ from placebo (FMD pre-IR: 8.3 ± 0.9%; post-IR: 2.1 ± 0.8%; P < 0.001; P = NS ANOVA, treatment group interaction). In contrast to acute administration, chronic rosuvastatin does not prevent the development of IR-induced endothelial dysfunction in normal humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22003053     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00083.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  5 in total

Review 1.  The coronary circulation in acute myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury: a target for cardioprotection.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; William Chilian; Filippo Crea; Sean M Davidson; Peter Ferdinandy; David Garcia-Dorado; Niels van Royen; Rainer Schulz; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  Atorvastatin protects endothelium by decreasing asymmetric dimethylarginine in dyslipidemia rats.

Authors:  Dongdan Zheng; Qing Liang; FanFang Zeng; Zhuocheng Mai; Anping Cai; Ruofeng Qiu; Rulin Xu; Dongjuan Li; Weiyi Mai
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Daily ischemic preconditioning provides sustained protection from ischemia-reperfusion induced endothelial dysfunction: a human study.

Authors:  Mary Clare Luca; Andrew Liuni; Kelsey McLaughlin; Tommaso Gori; John D Parker
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Plasma levels of the cardiovascular protective endogenous nucleoside adenosine are reduced in patients with primary aldosteronism without affecting ischaemia-reperfusion injury: A prospective case-control study.

Authors:  T N A Daniëlle van den Berg; Dick H J Thijssen; Anke C C M van Mil; Petra H van den Broek; Gerard A Rongen; Houshang Monajemi; Jaap Deinum; Niels P Riksen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.686

Review 5.  The Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning Supplementation on Endothelial Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xufang Gu; Zhichao Liu; Shengwei Gao; Li Ma; Jinhong Chen; Zhenxing Wang; Anmin Lu; Zhizhong Wang; Baohe Wang; Yuhong Li
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.629

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.