BACKGROUND: Although hospice use may be increasing among heart failure patients, its association with both cost and intensity of care in this population has not been well examined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of hospice care with resource utilization among a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure during the last 6 months of life. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the 5% sample of Medicare claims data. Negative binomial regression models were used to compare expenditures, hospitalization rates, and intensive care unit (ICU) days between hospice and nonhospice beneficiaries. We used Poisson regression models to compare utilization of certain procedures between hospice and nonhospice beneficiaries. RESULTS: Among 16613 Medicare beneficiaries who died with heart failure in 2007, 6436 (38.7%) received hospice care during the last 6 months of life. The mean total medical expenditures were $31,793 (SD 25,691) among decedents with hospice care, in comparison to $34,067 (SD 40,561) among decedents without hospice care. However, after adjustments for covariates, hospice care was associated with 4% higher expenditures (cost ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.01-1.07). Hospice use was associated with reduced hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-0.89), ICU days (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.73), and procedures, including cardiac catheterization, noninvasive ventilation, and mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower rates of hospitalization, ICU days, and invasive procedures, hospice care was not associated with reduced expenditures in heart failure. Financial savings related to reduced intensive medical care seems to be offset by the expenditures related to hospice care itself.
BACKGROUND: Although hospice use may be increasing among heart failurepatients, its association with both cost and intensity of care in this population has not been well examined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of hospice care with resource utilization among a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure during the last 6 months of life. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the 5% sample of Medicare claims data. Negative binomial regression models were used to compare expenditures, hospitalization rates, and intensive care unit (ICU) days between hospice and nonhospice beneficiaries. We used Poisson regression models to compare utilization of certain procedures between hospice and nonhospice beneficiaries. RESULTS: Among 16613 Medicare beneficiaries who died with heart failure in 2007, 6436 (38.7%) received hospice care during the last 6 months of life. The mean total medical expenditures were $31,793 (SD 25,691) among decedents with hospice care, in comparison to $34,067 (SD 40,561) among decedents without hospice care. However, after adjustments for covariates, hospice care was associated with 4% higher expenditures (cost ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.01-1.07). Hospice use was associated with reduced hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-0.89), ICU days (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.73), and procedures, including cardiac catheterization, noninvasive ventilation, and mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower rates of hospitalization, ICU days, and invasive procedures, hospice care was not associated with reduced expenditures in heart failure. Financial savings related to reduced intensive medical care seems to be offset by the expenditures related to hospice care itself.
Authors: Sydney Morss Dy; Lisa R Shugarman; Karl A Lorenz; Richard A Mularski; Joanne Lynn Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Donald H Taylor; Jan Ostermann; Courtney H Van Houtven; James A Tulsky; Karen Steinhauser Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2007-06-27 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Lawrence Liao; Kevin J Anstrom; John S Gottdiener; Paul A Pappas; David J Whellan; Dalane W Kitzman; Gerard P Aurigemma; Daniel B Mark; Kevin A Schulman; James G Jollis Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Lisa R Shugarman; Diane E Campbell; Chloe E Bird; Jon Gabel; Thomas A Louis; Joanne Lynn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Paul J Hauptman; Sarah J Goodlin; Margarita Lopatin; Maria Rosa Costanzo; Gregg C Fonarow; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-10-08
Authors: Jay R Horton; R Sean Morrison; Elizabeth Capezuti; Jennifer Hill; Eric J Lee; Amy S Kelley Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Michelle S Diop; James L Rudolph; Kristin M Zimmerman; Mary A Richter; L Michal Skarf Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Shi-Yi Wang; Melissa D Aldridge; Cary P Gross; Maureen Canavan; Emily Cherlin; Rosemary Johnson-Hurzeler; Elizabeth Bradley Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Daniel B Kramer; Matthew R Reynolds; Sharon-Lise Normand; Craig S Parzynski; John A Spertus; Vincent Mor; Susan L Mitchell Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 29.690