Literature DB >> 22002641

Impact of public reporting of coronary artery bypass graft surgery performance data on market share, mortality, and patient selection.

Patrick S Romano1, James P Marcin, Jian J Dai, Xiaowei D Yang, Richard L Kravitz, David M Rocke, Madan Dharmar, Zhongmin Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of publicly reporting risk-adjusted outcomes for hospitals and surgeons remains controversial, with particular concern about unintended consequences.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the impact of 3 reports from the voluntary California CABG Mortality Reporting Program (CCMRP) on hospital market share, hospital mortality, and patient selection for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed data from January 2000 to December 2005 for all patients receiving isolated CABG surgery in California. We compared hospital groups based on their quality classification, including low-mortality outliers ("better"), high-mortality outliers ("worse"), and nonoutliers, as well as participation in the CCMRP. MEASURES: We compared changes in market share, risk-adjusted mortality, and hospital caseload of high-risk patients for isolated CABG surgeries before and after the public release of 3 CCMRP reports (July 2001, August 2003, and February 2005).
RESULTS: Low-mortality outlier hospitals experienced significantly increased market share for isolated CABG surgery in the first 6 months after the public release of the CCMRP reports (relative change in adjusted mean market share=8.9%, P=0.002). We found no evidence to suggest reduced risk adjusted mortality after the release of the CCMRP reports, but high-mortality outlier hospitals, on average, operated on less sick patients (relative change in mean expected mortality=25%, P=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The release of public CABG hospital performance reports in California was associated with increased volume at low-mortality hospitals, and may have reduced referrals of high-risk patients to high-mortality hospitals (or risk avoidance).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22002641     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182358c78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

Review 1.  Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention.

Authors:  Nassir M Thalji; Rakesh M Suri; Kevin L Greason; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  The effect of consultant outcome publication on surgeon behaviour: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  M P Williams; V Modgil; M J Drake; F Keeley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Effect of Publicly Reported Aortic Valve Surgery Outcomes on Valve Surgery in Injection Drug- and Non-Injection Drug-Associated Endocarditis.

Authors:  Simeon D Kimmel; Alexander Y Walley; Benjamin P Linas; Bindu Kalesan; Eric Awtry; Nikola Dobrilovic; Laura White; Marc LaRochelle
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  The Impact of Public Performance Reporting on Market Share, Mortality, and Patient Mix Outcomes Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (2000-2016): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David Dunt; Khic-Houy Prang; Hana Sabanovic; Margaret Kelaher
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Center Variability in Medicare Claims-Based Publicly Reported Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Michael P Thompson; Hechuan Hou; Alexander A Brescia; Francis D Pagani; Devraj Sukul; Jeffrey S McCullough; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Power of national institutes of health stroke scale in assessing stroke systems of care.

Authors:  Edward C Jauch
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Can Urban-Rural Patterns of Hospital Selection Be Changed Using a Report Card Program? A Nationwide Observational Study.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsien Yu; Nikolas Matthes; Chung-Jen Wei
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.