Literature DB >> 22002269

Pelvic anatomy as a factor in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective study.

Jeong Yeon Kim1, Yong Wan Kim, Nam Kyu Kim, Hyuk Hur, KangYong Lee, Byung Soh Min, Hyun Jae Cho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (L-TME), focusing on the pelvic anatomy.
METHODS: Seventy-four patients who underwent L-TME were prospectively enrolled. Tumor and patient factors, including magnetic resonance imaging-based pelvic measurements (obstetric conjugate, sacral length, sacral depth, interspinous distance, and intertuberous distance), were analyzed with respect to pelvic dissection time. Variable significantly correlated with pelvic dissection time in linear regression were considered risk factors which we defined as lower or upper quartile of each significant variable. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: easy group, no risk factors; moderate group, 1 to 2 risk factors; and difficult group, ≥ 3 risk factors.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that long sacral length, shallow sacral angle, narrow intertuberous diameter, and large tumor size were significantly associated with longer pelvic dissection time (P=0.018, P<0.001, P=0.034, P=0.032, respectively). The cutoff values of the upper quartile were 11.5 cm and 4.5 cm for sacral length and tumor size, and cutoff values of the lower quartile were 3.0 cm and 8.9 cm for sacral depth and intertuberous diameter. Logistic regression analysis showed that difficult group significantly contributed to intraoperative complication (95% confidence interval: 1.364-122.313, P=0.026) but not postoperative complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Having a narrow, deep pelvis and a large tumor were not found to adversely affect postoperative outcomes. However, in terms of operation time and intraoperative difficulty, anatomical factors should be taken into consideration when planning L-TME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22002269     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822b0dcb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  15 in total

1.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy.

Authors:  Se Jin Baek; Chang Hee Kim; Min Soo Cho; Sung Uk Bae; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Hand-Assisted versus Straight-Laparoscopic versus Open Proctosigmoidectomy for Treatment of Sigmoid and Rectal Cancer: A Case-Matched Study of 100 Patients.

Authors:  Fazli C Gezen; Erman Aytac; Meagan M Costedio; Jon D Vogel; Emre Gorgun
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015

3.  Predicting the pathological features of the mesorectum before the laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sonia Fernández Ananín; Eduardo M Targarona; Carmen Martinez; Juan Carlos Pernas; Diana Hernández; Ignasi Gich; Francesc J Sancho; Manuel Trias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: a surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Avanish P Saklani; Sung Uk Bae; Amy Clayton; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision compared to open surgery.

Authors:  Jing Gong; De-Bing Shi; Xin-Xiang Li; San-Jun Cai; Zu-Qing Guan; Ye Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Increased perirenal fat area is not associated with adverse outcomes after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Katarina Levic; Orhan Bulut; Mette Schødt; Thue Bisgaard
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Shinji Mine; Koujiro Nishida; Yu Imamura; Takanori Kurogochi; Yuko Kitagawa; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Mesorectal fat area as a useful predictor of the difficulty of robotic-assisted laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yusuke Yamaoka; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa; Akinobu Furutani; Shoichi Manabe; Kakeru Torii; Kohei Koido; Keita Mori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Magnetic resonance-based pelvimetry and tumor volumetry can predict surgical difficulty and oncologic outcome in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Gulsen Atasoy; Naciye Cigdem Arslan; Funda Dinc Elibol; Ozgul Sagol; Funda Obuz; Selman Sokmen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Prospective Analysis of More than 1,000 Patients with Rectal Carcinoma: Are There Gender-Related Differences?

Authors:  Markus Kleemann; Claudia Benecke; Diana Helfrich; Hans-Peter Bruch; Tobias Keck; Tilman Laubert
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.