BACKGROUND: Maintaining continence is among the functions of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and their dysfunction can cause urinary incontinence (UI), which is a common occurrence during pregnancy and the puerperal period. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), therefore, is important during pregnancy, although most women perform the muscle contractions unsatisfactorily. OBJECTIVES: This study is an exploratory analysis of the results of three electromyographic (EMG) activity biofeedback sessions in pregnant women. METHODS: The study sample included 19 nulliparous women with low risk pregnancies. The participants performed three sessions of EMG biofeedback consisting of slow and fast contractions. The average value of the normalized amplitudes of surface electromyography was used to evaluate the results. The linear regression model with mixed effects was used for statistical analysis, with the EMG data normalized by maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). RESULTS: A steady increase in EMG amplitude was observed during each contraction and by the end of the biofeedback sessions, although this difference was only significant when comparing the first tonic contraction of each session (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that three sessions of training with biofeedback improved PFM EMG activity during the second trimester in women with low-risk pregnancies. The effectiveness of this protocol should be further investigated in randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND: Maintaining continence is among the functions of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and their dysfunction can cause urinary incontinence (UI), which is a common occurrence during pregnancy and the puerperal period. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), therefore, is important during pregnancy, although most women perform the muscle contractions unsatisfactorily. OBJECTIVES: This study is an exploratory analysis of the results of three electromyographic (EMG) activity biofeedback sessions in pregnant women. METHODS: The study sample included 19 nulliparous women with low risk pregnancies. The participants performed three sessions of EMG biofeedback consisting of slow and fast contractions. The average value of the normalized amplitudes of surface electromyography was used to evaluate the results. The linear regression model with mixed effects was used for statistical analysis, with the EMG data normalized by maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). RESULTS: A steady increase in EMG amplitude was observed during each contraction and by the end of the biofeedback sessions, although this difference was only significant when comparing the first tonic contraction of each session (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that three sessions of training with biofeedback improved PFM EMG activity during the second trimester in women with low-risk pregnancies. The effectiveness of this protocol should be further investigated in randomized controlled trials.
Authors: Flávia Ignácio Antonio Vassimon; Cristine Homsi Jorge Ferreira; Wellington Paula Martins; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Roberta Leopoldino de Andrade Batista; Kari Bo Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-10-17 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Giselle Notini Arcanjo; Juliana Lerche Vieira Rocha Pires; Maria Edna Mateus Jacinto; Josué Magalhães Colares; Lurdyanne Maria Cavalcante Belo; Pedro Olavo de Paula Lima; José Vilaça-Alves Journal: J Chiropr Med Date: 2022-04-21
Authors: Magdalena Piernicka; Monika Błudnicka; Jakub Kortas; Barbara Duda-Biernacka; Anna Szumilewicz Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Caroline B Prudencio; Marilza V C Rudge; Fabiane A Pinheiro; Carlos I Sartorão Filho; Sthefanie K Nunes; Cristiane R Pedroni; Baerbel Junginger; Angélica M P Barbosa Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Taís Pereira Miguel; Carla Elaine Laurienzo; Eliney Ferreira Faria; Almir José Sarri; Isabela Queiroz Castro; Renato José Affonso Júnior; Carlos Eduardo Mattos da Cunha Andrade; Marcelo de Andrade Vieira; Ricardo Dos Reis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.240