Literature DB >> 22001634

CpG island methylator phenotype infers a poor disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Peter Jo1, Klaus Jung, Marian Grade, Lena-Christin Conradi, Hendrik A Wolff, Julia Kitz, Heinz Becker, Josef Rüschoff, Arndt Hartmann, Tim Beissbarth, Annegret Müller-Dornieden, Michael Ghadimi, Regine Schneider-Stock, Jochen Gaedcke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced rectal cancers are treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT). However, subsets of patients have no benefit from preoperative treatment. Since epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, may influence response to neoadjuvant treatment we studied the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in patients who received a 5-fluouracil based RCT.
METHODS: One hundred fifty patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, treated within a phase III clinical trial (CAO/ARO/AIO-94 and -04), were included in this analysis. CIMP was assessed by methylation specific PCR (MSP) using RUNX3, SOCS1, NEUROG1, IGF2, and CACNA1G as a marker panel. Loss of mismatch repair gene (MMR) expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry for a subset of patients. KRAS and BRAF mutation status were assessed using Sanger sequencing.
RESULTS: The CIMP status could be established in all 150 patients. Fifteen (10%) revealed CIMP positivity (≥3 methylated promoters), whereas 135 patients (90%) where classified as CIMP negative. Analysis for MMR status did not reveal any microsatellite instability (MSI). A single mutation of the BRAF gene (D594G) was detected. The KRAS gene (exon 1, 2, and 3) was mutated in 65 tumors (43%) but was not correlated to a specific CIMP status. Three- and 5-year disease-free survival was notably worse in CIMP positive patients (56% and 0% vs 80% and 75%; P < .01) suggesting an increased likelihood of poor clinical outcome (HR 5.5; 95%CI: [2.1, 13.9]).
CONCLUSION: CIMP positivity, defined by methylation of at least 3 specific gene promoters, is an infrequent event in locally advanced rectal cancer. However, it increases the likelihood of distant metastases. Therefore, the CIMP status may be included as a molecular marker for the identification of high-risk patients and might contribute to individual treatment stratification. Copyright Â
© 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22001634     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  29 in total

1.  DNA hypermethylation as a predictor of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rory F Kokelaar; Huw G Jones; Jeremy Williamson; Namor Williams; A Paul Griffiths; John Beynon; Gareth J Jenkins; Dean A Harris
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 2.  Prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype among colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Y Juo; F M Johnston; D Y Zhang; H H Juo; H Wang; E P Pappou; T Yu; H Easwaran; S Baylin; M van Engeland; N Ahuja
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Molecular patterns in the evolution of serrated lesion of the colorectum.

Authors:  Timo Gaiser; Sandra Meinhardt; Daniela Hirsch; Jonathan Keith Killian; Jochen Gaedcke; Peter Jo; Immaculada Ponsa; Rosa Miró; Josef Rüschoff; Gerhard Seitz; Yue Hu; Jordi Camps; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer: epigenetic alterations and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Alberto Puccini; Martin D Berger; Madiha Naseem; Ryuma Tokunaga; Francesca Battaglin; Shu Cao; Diana L Hanna; Michelle McSkane; Shivani Soni; Wu Zhang; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 5.  Epigenetic Alterations in Colorectal Cancer: Emerging Biomarkers.

Authors:  Yoshinaga Okugawa; William M Grady; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Comprehensive methylome analysis of ovarian tumors reveals hedgehog signaling pathway regulators as prognostic DNA methylation biomarkers.

Authors:  Rui-Lan Huang; Fei Gu; Nameer B Kirma; Jianhua Ruan; Chun-Liang Chen; Hui-Chen Wang; Yu-Ping Liao; Cheng-Chang Chang; Mu-Hsien Yu; Jay M Pilrose; Ian M Thompson; Hsuan-Cheng Huang; Tim Hui-Ming Huang; Hung-Cheng Lai; Kenneth P Nephew
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 7.  Novel strategies for targeting leukemia stem cells: sounding the death knell for blood cancer.

Authors:  Antonieta Chavez-Gonzalez; Babak Bakhshinejad; Katayoon Pakravan; Monica L Guzman; Sadegh Babashah
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 6.730

8.  Review of the development of DNA methylation as a marker of response to neoadjuvant therapy and outcomes in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeremy S Williamson; Dean A Harris; John Beynon; Gareth J S Jenkins
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 6.551

9.  Hyperoxia-induced methylation decreases RUNX3 in a newborn rat model of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Authors:  Yuting Zhu; Jianhua Fu; Haiping Yang; Yuqing Pan; Li Yao; Xindong Xue
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2015-06-24

10.  Potential of DNA methylation in rectal cancer as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

Authors:  Ruth Exner; Walter Pulverer; Martina Diem; Lisa Spaller; Laura Woltering; Martin Schreiber; Brigitte Wolf; Markus Sonntagbauer; Fabian Schröder; Judith Stift; Fritz Wrba; Michael Bergmann; Andreas Weinhäusel; Gerda Egger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.