Literature DB >> 22001586

Plasma membrane disruptions with different modes of injurious mechanical ventilation in normal rat lungs*.

Matteo Pecchiari1, Ario Monaco, Antonia Koutsoukou, Edgardo D'Angelo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Plasma membrane disruptions are caused by excessive mechanical stress and thought to be involved in inflammatory mediator upregulation. Presently, plasma membrane disruption formation has been studied only during mechanical ventilation with large tidal volumes and limitedly to subpleural alveoli. No information is available concerning the distribution of plasma membrane disruptions within the lung or the development of plasma membrane disruptions during another modality of injurious mechanical ventilation, i.e., mechanical ventilation with eupneic tidal volume (7 mL · kg) at low end-expiratory lung volume. The aim of this study is to assess whether 1) mechanical ventilation with eupneic tidal volume at low end-expiratory lung volume causes plasma membrane disruptions; and 2) the distribution of plasma membrane disruptions differs from that of mechanical ventilation with large tidal volume at normal end-expiratory lung volume.
DESIGN: Experimental animal model.
SUBJECTS: Sprague-Dawley rats.
INTERVENTIONS: Plasma membrane disruptions have been detected as red spots in gelatin-included slices of rat lungs stained with ethidium homodimer-1 shortly after anesthesia (control) after prolonged mechanical ventilation with eupneic tidal volume at low end-expiratory lung volume followed or not by the restoration of physiological end-expiratory lung volume and after prolonged mechanical ventilation with large tidal volumes and normal end-expiratory lung volume.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma membrane disruptions increased during mechanical ventilation at low end-expiratory lung volume, mainly at the bronchiolar level. Resealing of most plasma membrane disruptions occurred on restoration of normal end-expiratory lung volume. Mechanical ventilation with large tidal volume caused the appearance of plasma membrane disruptions, both bronchiolar and parenchymal, the latter to a much greater extent than with mechanical ventilation at low end-expiratory lung volume. The increase of plasma membrane disruptions correlated with the concomitant increase of airway resistance with both modes of mechanical ventilation.
CONCLUSIONS: : Amount and distribution of plasma membrane disruptions between small airways and lung parenchyma depends on the type of injurious mechanical ventilation. This could be relevant to the release of inflammatory mediators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22001586     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da2b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  7 in total

1.  Does oxygen tune cellular mechanotransduction?

Authors:  Rolf D Hubmayr
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 5.464

2.  Biophysical determinants of alveolar epithelial plasma membrane wounding associated with mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Omar Hussein; Bruce Walters; Randolph Stroetz; Paul Valencia; Deborah McCall; Rolf D Hubmayr
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 3.  Mechanical ventilation-associated lung fibrosis in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a significant contributor to poor outcome.

Authors:  Nuria E Cabrera-Benitez; John G Laffey; Matteo Parotto; Peter M Spieth; Jesús Villar; Haibo Zhang; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Linking lung function to structural damage of alveolar epithelium in ventilator-induced lung injury.

Authors:  Katharine L Hamlington; Bradford J Smith; Celia M Dunn; Chantel M Charlebois; Gregory S Roy; Jason H T Bates
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-05-06       Impact factor: 1.931

5.  Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury (VILI) in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): Volutrauma and Molecular Effects.

Authors:  R Carrasco Loza; G Villamizar Rodríguez; N Medel Fernández
Journal:  Open Respir Med J       Date:  2015-06-26

Review 6.  Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Fibrosis versus Repair.

Authors:  Daniel Im; Wei Shi; Barbara Driscoll
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Expiratory flow-limitation in mechanically ventilated patients: A risk for ventilator-induced lung injury?

Authors:  Antonia Koutsoukou; Matteo Pecchiari
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-01-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.