Literature DB >> 22001582

Perceived effects of attending physician workload in academic medical intensive care units: a national survey of training program directors.

Nicholas S Ward1, Richard Read, Bekele Afessa, Jeremy M Kahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increases in the size and number of American intensive care units have not been accompanied by a comparable increase in the critical care physician workforce, raising concerns that intensivists are becoming overburdened by workload. This is especially concerning in academic intensive care units where attending physicians must couple teaching duties with patient care.
METHODS: We performed an in-person and electronic survey of the membership of the Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors, soliciting information about patient workload, other hospital and medical education duties, and perceptions of the workplace and teaching environment of their intensive care units.
RESULTS: Eighty-four out of a total 121 possible responses were received from program directors or their delegates, resulting in a response rate of 69%. The average daily (SD) census (as perceived by the respondents) was 18.8 ± 8.9 patients, and average (SD) maximum service size recalled was 24.1 ± 9.9 patients. Twenty-seven percent reported no policy setting an upper limit for the daily census. Twenty-eight percent of respondents felt the average census was "too many" and 71% felt the maximum size was "too many." The median (interquartile range) patient-to-attending physician ratio was 13 (10-16). When categorized according to this median, respondents from intensive care units with high patient/physician ratios (n = 31) perceived significantly more time constraints, more stress, and difficulties with teaching trainees than respondents with low patient/physician ratios (n = 40). The total number of non-nursing healthcare workers per patient was similar in both groups, suggesting that having more nonattending physician staff does not alleviate perceptions of overwork and stress in the attending physician.
CONCLUSIONS: Academic intensive care unit physicians that direct fellowship programs frequently perceived being overburdened in the intensive care unit. Understaffing intensive care units with attending physicians may have a negative impact on teaching, patient care, and workforce stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22001582     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232d997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  13 in total

1.  Outcomes of Nurse Practitioner-Delivered Critical Care: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Janna S Landsperger; Matthew W Semler; Li Wang; Daniel W Byrne; Arthur P Wheeler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Estimates of the need for palliative care consultation across united states intensive care units using a trigger-based model.

Authors:  May S Hua; Guohua Li; Craig D Blinderman; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Identifying potential predictors of a safe attending physician workload: a survey of hospitalists.

Authors:  Henry J Michtalik; Peter J Pronovost; Jill A Marsteller; Joanne Spetz; Daniel J Brotman
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Training internists to meet critical care needs in the United States: a consensus statement from the Critical Care Societies Collaborative (CCSC).

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Twelve tips for reducing production time and increasing long-term usability of instructional video.

Authors:  Marie K Norman
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  County-Level Effects of Prehospital Regionalization of Critically Ill Patients: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Osama Alotaik; David J Wallace; Ahmed E Elhabashy; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Thomas D Rea; Derek C Angus; Graham Nichol; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Feasibility and utility of the use of real time random safety audits in adult ICU patients: a multicentre study.

Authors:  M Bodí; M Olona; M C Martín; R Alceaga; J C Rodríguez; E Corral; J M Pérez Villares; G Sirgo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  SWEAT ICU-An Observational Study of Physician Workload and the Association of Physician Outcomes in Academic ICUs.

Authors:  Ankita Agarwal; Jen-Ting Chen; Craig M Coopersmith; Joshua L Denson; Neal W Dickert; Lauren E Ferrante; Hayley B Gershengorn; Adhiraj D Gosine; Bradley J Hayward; Navneet Kaur; Akram Khan; Courtney Lamberton; Douglas Landsittel; Patrick G Lyons; Mark E Mikkelsen; Nandita R Nadig; Anthony P Pietropaoli; Brian R Poole; Elizabeth M Viglianti; Jonathan E Sevransky
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-10-13

9.  A mathematical model to evaluate the routine use of fecal microbiota transplantation to prevent incident and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Eric T Lofgren; Rebekah W Moehring; Deverick J Anderson; David J Weber; Nina H Fefferman
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  Henry T Stelfox; Laure Perrier; Sharon E Straus; William A Ghali; David Zygun; Paul Boiteau; Danny J Zuege
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.