Literature DB >> 22000281

Factors governing the healing of Staphylococcus aureus infections following hip and knee prosthesis implantation: a retrospective study of 95 patients.

D Joulie1, J Girard, O Mares, E Beltrand, L Legout, H Dezèque, H Migaud, E Senneville.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic factors for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections are poorly known, notably because of the heterogeneous management in terms of both antibiotic administration and adopted surgical strategy. Uniform treatment regimens would make it easier to define the outcome of these S. aureus infections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2006, 95 patients with a S. aureus joint infection after THA or TKA were treated, strictly following a standardized protocol according to the recommendations of Zimmerli et al. The patients' mean age was 65.7 years, 71 with THA and 28 with TKA (four patients had two infected joints). These 95 patients presented 120 infectious episodes, all of whom had surgical treatment: 53 lavages (44.1%), 17 one-stage prosthesis revisions (14.2%), 29 two-stage prosthesis revisions (24.2%), and 21 prostheses removed (17.5%). On the intraoperative samples taken, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) was isolated in 88 patients (73.3%) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in 18 patients (15%); finally 14 patients were included because of the positive results of preoperative samples taken. Twenty-seven infections (22.5%) were multibacterial, including at least S. aureus and 93 were single S. aureus bacteria. Success was defined at a minimum 12 months of follow-up by the association of the following parameters: normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and/or C-reactive protein (CRP) results, noninflammatory scar with no fistula, no surgical revision, and no antibiotic treatment.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 38±24.9 months, 81 of the 120 infectious episodes were resolved (67.5%) and 77 of the 95 patients were healed (81%). Six parameters significantly influenced the healing of the infection: initial cementless fixation, THA, preoperative knowledge of the bacterium, immediate postoperative antibiotic therapy adapted to the microbiological data, changing the prosthesis, and monobacterial infection. Only the latter two were independent, with an odds ratio of 5 (1.6-14.9) and 2.9 (1.1-7.7) respectively. However, resistance to methicillin did not appear to be a factor of failure. DISCUSSION: Management of prosthetic S. aureus infections according to a uniform protocol in a specialized medical center healed the infection in 81% of the patients. Treatment improvement requires knowledge of the bacterium, adaptation of immediate probabilistic antibiotic therapy, and preference for changing the prosthesis over simple lavage.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22000281     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  9 in total

1.  Cementless modular intramedullary nail without bone-on-bone fusion as a salvage procedure in chronically infected total knee prosthesis: long-term results.

Authors:  Sara Scarponi; Lorenzo Drago; Delia Romanò; Nicola Logoluso; Andrea Peccati; Enzo Meani; Carlo L Romanò
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Can Good Infection Control Be Obtained in One-stage Exchange of the Infected TKA to a Rotating Hinge Design? 10-year Results.

Authors:  Akos Zahar; Daniel O Kendoff; Till O Klatte; Thorsten A Gehrke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Clinical spectrum and outcome of critically ill patients suffering from prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Y Maaloum; A Meybeck; D Olive; N Boussekey; P-Y Delannoy; A Chiche; H Georges; E Beltrand; E Senneville; T d'Escrivan; O Leroy
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Infection recurrence factors in one- and two-stage total knee prosthesis exchanges.

Authors:  P Massin; T Delory; L Lhotellier; G Pasquier; O Roche; A Cazenave; C Estellat; J Y Jenny
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Aaron J Tande; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  A novel open synovectomy technique using an arthroscopy shaver blade in revision surgery to treat infected total knee arthroplasty: a technical note.

Authors:  Oog-Jin Shon; In Jun Lee; Gi Beom Kim
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 7.  Outcome of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Staphylococcal Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections, Focused on Rifampicin Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  H Scheper; L M Gerritsen; B G Pijls; S A Van Asten; L G Visser; M G J De Boer
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.835

8.  2-stage revision of 120 deep infected hip and knee prostheses using gentamicin-PMMA beads.

Authors:  Daniël M C Janssen; Jan A P Geurts; Liesbeth M C Jütten; Geert H I M Walenkamp
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection with Debridement, Antibiotics and Irrigation with Implant Retention - a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ricardo Sousa; Miguel Araújo Abreu
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2018-06-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.