Literature DB >> 21999884

Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children.

Om P Gandhi1, L Lloyd Morgan, Alvaro Augusto de Salles, Yueh-Ying Han, Ronald B Herberman, Devra Lee Davis.   

Abstract

The existing cell phone certification process uses a plastic model of the head called the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM), representing the top 10% of U.S. military recruits in 1989 and greatly underestimating the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for typical mobile phone users, especially children. A superior computer simulation certification process has been approved by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) but is not employed to certify cell phones. In the United States, the FCC determines maximum allowed exposures. Many countries, especially European Union members, use the "guidelines" of International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), a non governmental agency. Radiofrequency (RF) exposure to a head smaller than SAM will absorb a relatively higher SAR. Also, SAM uses a fluid having the average electrical properties of the head that cannot indicate differential absorption of specific brain tissue, nor absorption in children or smaller adults. The SAR for a 10-year old is up to 153% higher than the SAR for the SAM model. When electrical properties are considered, a child's head's absorption can be over two times greater, and absorption of the skull's bone marrow can be ten times greater than adults. Therefore, a new certification process is needed that incorporates different modes of use, head sizes, and tissue properties. Anatomically based models should be employed in revising safety standards for these ubiquitous modern devices and standards should be set by accountable, independent groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21999884     DOI: 10.3109/15368378.2011.622827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electromagn Biol Med        ISSN: 1536-8386            Impact factor:   2.882


  21 in total

1.  Increasing rates of brain tumours in the Swedish national inpatient register and the causes of death register.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Michael Carlberg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Multifocal Breast Cancer in Young Women with Prolonged Contact between Their Breasts and Their Cellular Phones.

Authors:  John G West; Nimmi S Kapoor; Shu-Yuan Liao; June W Chen; Lisa Bailey; Robert A Nagourney
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2013-09-18

Review 3.  Searching for the perfect wave: the effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on cells.

Authors:  Lisa Gherardini; Gastone Ciuti; Selene Tognarelli; Caterina Cinti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Decreased survival of glioma patients with astrocytoma grade IV (glioblastoma multiforme) associated with long-term use of mobile and cordless phones.

Authors:  Michael Carlberg; Lennart Hardell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the Nordic countries with main focus on Swedish data.

Authors:  Michael Carlberg; Lena Hedendahl; Mikko Ahonen; Tarmo Koppel; Lennart Hardell
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Radiofrequency radiation at Stockholm Central Railway Station in Sweden and some medical aspects on public exposure to RF fields.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Tarmo Koppel; Michael Carlberg; Mikko Ahonen; Lena Hedendahl
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  Exposure to RF-EMF Alters Postsynaptic Structure and Hinders Neurite Outgrowth in Developing Hippocampal Neurons of Early Postnatal Mice.

Authors:  Ju Hwan Kim; Kyung Hwun Chung; Yeong Ran Hwang; Hye Ran Park; Hee Jung Kim; Hyung-Gun Kim; Hak Rim Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimetric quantity for electromagnetic fields bioeffects.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Real versus Simulated Mobile Phone Exposures in Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Upwardly mobile: Lowered hearing?

Authors:  U K Menon
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.