Literature DB >> 21999402

Email interviewing: generating data with a vulnerable population.

Catherine Cook1.   

Abstract

AIMS: This paper describes online recruitment and the email interviewing data collection method with women diagnosed with a viral sexually transmitted infection. The paper highlights the advantages of the method to researchers and participants when conducting research where face-to-face participation may difficult.
BACKGROUND: Online recruitment and in-depth email interviewing have been used by only a small number of nurses internationally. The method enables inclusion of people who might otherwise be excluded from research, for reasons such as geographical distance, incompatible time frames, clinicians''gate-keeping' and participants' desire for anonymity for physical or emotional reasons.
METHODS: In-depth email interviews were conducted with 26 women in New Zealand, United States of America, Canada and England who had a diagnosis of either human papilloma virus or genital herpes simplex virus. Data were collected during 2007-2008 and analysed using a poststructuralist, feminist thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Participant retention was high. Women emphasized satisfaction with the process. Asynchronous interviews allowed for additional reflexivity in the researcher's responses and rich data generation.
CONCLUSION: This method has the potential to enable nurses to include vulnerable and relatively inaccessible participants in 'sensitive' research. In-depth email interviews may generate rich data through a process participants deem to be of personal value.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21999402     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05843.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the burdens and benefits of participation in research by parents of children with life-limiting illnesses.

Authors:  Audrey Hopper; Stacey Crane
Journal:  Nurse Res       Date:  2019-07-18

2.  Comparing appropriateness and equivalence of email interviews to phone interviews in qualitative research on reproductive decisions.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Karen Kavanaugh
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.257

3.  Costs and Efficiency of Online and Offline Recruitment Methods: A Web-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tina Christensen; Anders H Riis; Elizabeth E Hatch; Lauren A Wise; Marie G Nielsen; Kenneth J Rothman; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Ellen M Mikkelsen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Transmasculine Persons' Experiences of Encounters with Health Care Professionals Within Reproductive, Perinatal, and Sexual Health in Sweden: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Kristin Asklöv; Regina Ekenger; Carina Berterö
Journal:  Transgend Health       Date:  2021-12-02

5.  Cancer patient perspectives on survivorship goals from the Smart Patients online community.

Authors:  Mekhala Hoskote; Gem Le; Roy Cherian; Roni Zeiger; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome - an exploratory comparative analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Krouwel; Kate Jolly; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.