Sanjay N Rao1. 1. Lakeside Eye Group, SC, Chicago, Illinois 60601, USA. sanjayrao@pol.net
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the reversibility of clinical benefits of cyclosporine 0.05% (Restasis(®); Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) therapy and the therapeutic gain after its delayed use by switching treatment modalities in patients with dry eyes who completed a 1-year course of therapy with artificial tears (Refresh Endura(®); Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) or cyclosporine 0.05%. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, investigator-masked, longitudinal extension trial. Patients who had been treated withcyclosporine 0.05% in the first year of study were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either cyclosporine 0.05% (Cs-Cs; n=20) or artificial tears (Cs-At; n=8), and those who had been originally randomized to artificial tears were switched to cyclosporine 0.05% (At-Cs; n=20) in the second year of study. Patients received study drugs twice daily for 12 months. Disease severity was assessed according to the International Task Force consensus guideline at months 0 and 12. Signs and symptoms were evaluated at baseline (month 0) and months 4, 8, and 12. RESULTS: At baseline, most patients with Cs-Cs and Cs-At (>90%) had level 2 disease severity, whereas almost half of the patients with At-Cs had level 3 disease severity. At month 12, a significantly higher percentage of patients with Cs-Cs and At-Cs than patients with Cs-At had the same or lower disease severity (P<0.001); whereas half of patients with Cs-At, compared with patients with no Cs-Cs and At-Cs, had disease progression at month 12. Throughout the study, dry eye signs and symptoms continuously improved in patients with Cs-Cs and At-Cs, whereas they constantly worsened in patients with Cs-At. At month 12, patients with Cs-Cs and At-Cs had significantly greater mean percentage improvement from baseline than did patients with Cs-At in Schirmer test scores, tear breakup time, Oxford staining scores, Ocular Surface Disease Index scores, and conjunctival goblet cell density (P<0.001). Overall, sign and symptom scores of patients with At-Cs did not improve as much as they did for patients with Cs-Cs. CONCLUSIONS:Cyclosporine 0.05% withdrawal led to disease progression, thus indicating the necessity for maintenance therapy. Earlier treatment with cyclosporine 0.05% may result in improved outcomes.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To assess the reversibility of clinical benefits of cyclosporine 0.05% (Restasis(®); Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) therapy and the therapeutic gain after its delayed use by switching treatment modalities in patients with dry eyes who completed a 1-year course of therapy with artificial tears (Refresh Endura(®); Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) or cyclosporine 0.05%. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, investigator-masked, longitudinal extension trial. Patients who had been treated with cyclosporine 0.05% in the first year of study were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either cyclosporine 0.05% (Cs-Cs; n=20) or artificial tears (Cs-At; n=8), and those who had been originally randomized to artificial tears were switched to cyclosporine 0.05% (At-Cs; n=20) in the second year of study. Patients received study drugs twice daily for 12 months. Disease severity was assessed according to the International Task Force consensus guideline at months 0 and 12. Signs and symptoms were evaluated at baseline (month 0) and months 4, 8, and 12. RESULTS:At baseline, most patients with Cs-Cs and Cs-At (>90%) had level 2 disease severity, whereas almost half of the patients with At-Cs had level 3 disease severity. At month 12, a significantly higher percentage of patients with Cs-Cs and At-Cs than patients with Cs-At had the same or lower disease severity (P<0.001); whereas half of patients with Cs-At, compared with patients with no Cs-Cs and At-Cs, had disease progression at month 12. Throughout the study, dry eye signs and symptoms continuously improved in patients with Cs-Cs and At-Cs, whereas they constantly worsened in patients with Cs-At. At month 12, patients with Cs-Cs and At-Cs had significantly greater mean percentage improvement from baseline than did patients with Cs-At in Schirmer test scores, tear breakup time, Oxford staining scores, Ocular Surface Disease Index scores, and conjunctival goblet cell density (P<0.001). Overall, sign and symptom scores of patients with At-Cs did not improve as much as they did for patients with Cs-Cs. CONCLUSIONS:Cyclosporine 0.05% withdrawal led to disease progression, thus indicating the necessity for maintenance therapy. Earlier treatment with cyclosporine 0.05% may result in improved outcomes.
Authors: Nicole L Lanza; Allison L McClellan; Hatim Batawi; Elizabeth R Felix; Konstantinos D Sarantopoulos; Roy C Levitt; Anat Galor Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Karl G Stonecipher; Jenny Chia; Ahunna Onyenwenyi; Linda Villanueva; David A Hollander Journal: Ther Clin Risk Manag Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: Shin Ae Park; Kathryn L Good; Sara M Thomasy; Philip H Kass; Christopher J Murphy Journal: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 2.850