Literature DB >> 21998922

Genomic designation: how genetics can delineate new, phenotypically diffuse medical categories.

Daniel Navon1.   

Abstract

This paper reports and discusses 'genomic designation' as a way of classifying people. In genomic designation the object of biomedical analysis--and the concomitant medical category that is subject to scientific, clinical, and social action--is delineated on a genomic basis, while the phenotype is decentralized and tabulated post factum. Unlike prominent sociological concepts such as biosociality or geneticization, where genetic proclivities for or explanations of phenotypic categories affect social processes, genomic designation treats characteristics of the genome as the essential referent of new categories of illness. I outline the relevant sociological literature and the shift to what Nikolas Rose has called the 'molecular gaze' before explicating the concept ofgenomic designation and its half-century history. I use 22q13 Deletion/Phelan-McDermid syndrome as an example of genomic designation: investigations into the deletion of genetic material at site q13 on the 22nd chromosome preceded and made practicable the delineation of a syndrome more than a decade later, even though the associated phenotype is not distinct enough for diagnosis. Finally, I discuss the implications of this turn to 'rigidly designate' kinds of people according to observations made at the level of the genome and outline directions for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21998922     DOI: 10.1177/0306312710391923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Stud Sci        ISSN: 0306-3127            Impact factor:   3.885


  12 in total

1.  Failing, hacking, passing: Autism, entanglement, and the ethics of transformation.

Authors:  Gregory Hollin
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2017-12

2.  Homogeneity and heterogeneity as situational properties: producing--and moving beyond?--race in post-genomic science.

Authors:  Janet K Shim; Katherine Weatherford Darling; Martine D Lappe; L Katherine Thomson; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Robert A Hiatt; Sara L Ackerman
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.885

3.  The maternal body as environment in autism science.

Authors:  Martine Lappé
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 3.885

4.  Genetic counseling, activism and 'genotype-first' diagnosis of developmental disorders.

Authors:  Daniel Navon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Encoding, memory, and transcoding deficits in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Heather L Lohmeier; Edythe A Strand; Kathy J Jakielski
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Genetic ancestry testing among white nationalists: From identity repair to citizen science.

Authors:  Aaron Panofsky; Joan Donovan
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.885

7.  Identity, community and care in online accounts of hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Emily Ross; Tineke Broer; Anne Kerr; Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2018-05-02

8.  The rare and the common: scale and the genetic imaginary in Alzheimer's disease drug development.

Authors:  Richard Milne
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2019-07-16

9.  Autobiologies on YouTube: Narratives of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Anna Harris; Susan E Kelly; Sally Wyatt
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2014-03-07

10.  Autistic Heterogeneity: Linking Uncertainties and Indeterminacies.

Authors:  Gregory Hollin
Journal:  Sci Cult (Lond)       Date:  2016-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.