OBJECTIVE: Punica granatum has been used for many years in folk medicine due to several purposes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of methanolic extract of Punica granatum peel (MEPGP) against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus sanguinis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Actynomyces viscosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Candida albicans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, the mentioned oral organisms were cultured in blood agar and mueller-hinton media and then paper disks containing MEPGP at concentrations of 4 mg/ml, 8 mg/ml and 12 mg/ml were inserted on medias. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated by agar disk diffusion method. The effects of three different concentrations of MEPGP against microorganisms were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests. RESULTS: All concentrations of MEPGP had antibacterial activity against S. aureus and S. epidermidis. Only at concentration of 8 mg/ml and 12 mg/ml MEPGP was effective against L. acidophilus, S. mutans and S. salivarius. Furthermore; no concentrations of MEPGP inhibited A. viscosus and C. albicans. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that MEPGP might be used as an antibacterial agent in controlling oral infections.
OBJECTIVE:Punica granatum has been used for many years in folk medicine due to several purposes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of methanolic extract of Punica granatum peel (MEPGP) against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus sanguinis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Actynomyces viscosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Candida albicans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, the mentioned oral organisms were cultured in blood agar and mueller-hinton media and then paper disks containing MEPGP at concentrations of 4 mg/ml, 8 mg/ml and 12 mg/ml were inserted on medias. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated by agar disk diffusion method. The effects of three different concentrations of MEPGP against microorganisms were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests. RESULTS: All concentrations of MEPGP had antibacterial activity against S. aureus and S. epidermidis. Only at concentration of 8 mg/ml and 12 mg/ml MEPGP was effective against L. acidophilus, S. mutans and S. salivarius. Furthermore; no concentrations of MEPGP inhibited A. viscosus and C. albicans. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that MEPGP might be used as an antibacterial agent in controlling oral infections.
In the recent decades, the interest in evaluating therapeutic effects of plants has increased dramatically [1,2] as 80% of the world’s people rely on complementary and alternative medicine for their health care needs [3,4]. Phytoplants have been shown to be good alternatives to synthetic chemical antimicrobial agents and antibiotics because of the serious side effects, antimicrobial resistance and the emergence of previously uncommon infections that have been reported to be on the increase due to inappropriate or widespread overuse of antimicrobials [5,6]. On the other hand, clinicians should remind the potential risk of urticaria, alteration in taste, increase of calculus formation, staining of teeth and mucous membranes and more rarely, oral mucosa desquamation and parotid swelling before prescribing chlorhexidine mouth wash as an antimicrobial agent [7,8]. However, from 250,000–500,000 natures found on earth, only one percent of them have been assessed for their pharmaceutical potential [9]. There are manuscripts proving the effects of Iranian native herbal extracts [10-13]. Punica granatum (pomegranate) is native to the region from northern India to Iran. But it is also widely cultivated now in parts of Southwest America, California, Mexico, Arizona and Africa [14,15]. Pharmacological effects of pomegranate represent a long history and have been mentioned in the Greek and Egyptian documents [16,17]. Recently, studies have shown that pomegranate has many potential effects including: bacteriocidal, antifungal, antiviral, immune modulation, vermifuge, stimulant, refrigerant, astringent, stomachic, styptic, laxative, diuretic and anthelmintic. Moreover, it serves to decrease the adverse effects of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, diarrhea, dysentery, asthma, bronchitis, cough, bleeding disorders, fever, inflammation, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, dyspepsia, ulcers, bruises, sores, mouth lesions, skin lesions, malaria, prostate cancer, atherosclerosis, hypertension, periodontal diseases, hyper lipidemia, denture stomatitis, male infertility, vaginitis, erectile dysfunction, alzheimer, obesity and infantbrain ischemia [4,9,14-17]. Furthermore, pomegranate is an amazing source of cyaniding, delphinidin (both are anthocyanidins), caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid (both are phenolic acids), gallic acid, ellagic acid (tannic acids), luteolin, quercetin (flavones), kaempferol (a flavonol), naringenin (a flavanone) as well as 17-alpha-estradiol, estrone, estriol, testosterone, beta-sistosterol, coumesterol, gamma-tocopherol, punicie acid, campesterol and stigmasterol in its juice, peels and seed oil that are chemopreventive and therapeutic potentials of this plant [14,18]. Review of the literature from 1999 to the present showed that scientific papers relating to the therapeutic effects of pomegranate are increasing compared to only 25 publications from 1950 to 1999 [14,15]. Since pomegranate has varied medical effects, it should be considered by researchers in different parts of medical sciences. Therefore, this study has been based on the antibacterial and antifungal properties of Punica granatum on different oral pathogens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of the Plant Extract
Firstly fresh pomegranates (500 gr) were obtained (in order to prepare fresh extraction) from a public market in the city of Hamadan, Iran. The peels of pomegranate were separated and oven dried at 33°C for 7 days. The dried peels were powdered in an electric grinder and stored in plastic bags for the next step. A 100 gm sample of powder was extracted using 200 ml methanol (99.9%) in an electric blender for 30 min. This suspension was filtered three times per day for 30 days. New methanol dissolvent was used each time. Then methanol was removed in a rotary evaporator to produce a dry powder. The final material was dissolved in methanol for obtaining concentrations of 4mg/ml, 8mg/ml and 12 mg/ml of dry plant powder [9,16,19]. Then specimens were sent to the institute of biological science for assessment of their antibacterial and antifungal effects.
Microorganisms
Type strains were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and Persian Type Culture Collection (PTCC) as follows: Streptococcus mutans (PTCC 1683), Streptococcus sanguinis (PTCC 1449), Streptococcus salivarius (PTCC 1448), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Staphylococcus epidermidis (PTCC 1114), Actinomyces viscosus (PTCC 1202), Lactobacillus acidophilus (PTCC 1643) and Candida albicans (PTCC 5027), which were all obtained from the microbiology laboratory of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. Each of the bacterial specimens was incubated in liquid culture dilutions (Tryptone Soy Broth, Oxoid, British) and incubated at 37°C for 20 min to reach the logarithmic stage, then measured to a 0.5 Mc Farland dilution (standard concentrations) which delivered a final concentration of approximately 105 CFU per ml. Then the agar plates with methanolic extract of Punica granatum peel (MEPGP) were incubated over night at 37°C [20].
Antibacterial Tests
We tested MEPG at different concentrations using a standard diffusion technique [4,9,21-24]. The MEPGP samples were inserted in 6 mm sterile filter disks (Blank paper, Padtan Teb, Iran) and incubated for 20 min at 37°C and collected in sterile containers. The disks were then placed on the surface of blood agar and meuller-hinton agar (Merk, Germany), in which the microorganisms were cultured. Ciprofloxacin and nystatin disks served as the positive control and diluted methanol was used as the negative control. Finally, we measured the diameter of inhibition zones in millimeter after 24 hours. We placed four disks for each concentration in an 8 cm plate and calculated the mean of inhibition zones. One expert microbiologist conducted all the procedures. We analyzed the data using one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
After evaluating the antibacterial and antifungal effects of three different concentrations of MEPGP, the positive control produced significantly large inhibition zones for all microorganisms and the negative control showed no markable inhibitory effect. It was found that all concentrations of MEPGP (4 mg/ml, 8 mg/ml and 12 mg/ml) inhibited S. aureus and S. epidermidis. In addition, the concentration of 12 mg/ml was the most effective extract against S. aureus compared with the others. Only two MEPGP concentrations of 8 mg/ml, 12 mg/ml were effective against S. sanguinis, L. acidophilus, S. mutans and S. salivarius and there was no significant difference between these concentrations (P=1, P=1, P=0.064). No concentrations of MEPGP inhibited A. viscosus and C. albicans. Detailed antibacterial and antifungal effects of MEPGP against eight certain oral pathogens are demonstrated in Table 1.
Table 1
Antibacterial and antifungal properties of methanolic extract of punica granatum at three different concentrations.
Microbial Strains
Antimicrobial Activity at*
P.Value
F
Conc. of 4
Conc. of 8
Conc. of 12
Positive Control**
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Staphylococcus aureus
7.5
0.57
11.5
0.56
12.5
0.58
30
0.000
155.66
Staphylococcus epidermis
11.5
0.57
13.5
0.59
13.5
0.58
29
0.000
20.00
Lactobacillus acidophilus
6.5
0.57
10.0
0.00
10.0
0
14
0.000
227.00
Actinomyces viscosus
6.0
0.00
6.5
0.57
6.5
0.57
25
0.168
2.00
Streptococcus mutans
6.0
0.00
9.5
0.57
9.5
0.57
24
0.000
98.00
Streptococcus sanguinis
6.5
0.57
10.0
0.00
11.5
0.58
25
0.000
172.00
Streptococcus salivarius
6.5
0.58
8.5
0.59
9.5
0.60
26
0.000
43.66
Candida albicans
6.0
0.00
6.5
0.57
6.5
0.57
40
0.168
2.00
measured by the diameter of zone of inhibition in mm, Conc= Concentration,
Ciprofloxacin and nystatin are the positive control group.
DISCUSSION
In the recent years, the use of plants with preventive and therapeutic effects contributes to health care needs [25]. There are three main reasons to be interested in the treating and healing power of plant extract. First, pharmacological studies have demonstrated that many of plants are known to possess antimicrobial agents; second, people are becoming aware of the side effects associated with the over prescription of traditional antibiotics; third, time to time resistant microorganisms against antibiotics are increasing [9,22,25]. Among these plants, punica granate has an important role in folk medicine. Pomegranate is known as a rich source of pharmacological properties which have been evaluated due to antiparasitic, antibacterial, antifungal, antiproliferative, apoptotic and anti-cancer effects as well as protection against herpes virus, inhibition of LDL oxidation and decrease in atheromatous plaque formation and reduction of systolic blood pressure [17,18,22]. Results of the present study showed that MEPGP was effective against some common oral pathogens such as S. epidermidis, S. aureus, L. acidophilus, S. mutans, S. sanguinis and S. salivarius, but not effective against A. viscosus and C. albicans. Review of literature showed that some researchers such as Naz et al [22], Vasconcelos et al [26] and Singh et al [27] also reported that extracts of Punica granatum peel in different concentrations were effective against S. epidermidis, S. aureus, S. mutans, S. sanguinis and S. salivarius. It is demonstrated that this antibacterial activity may be related to the presence of hydrolysable tannins and polyphenolics in the pomegranate extract specifically punicalagin and gallagic acid [17,19]. It means that the antimicrobial effect of tannins is related to its toxicity and molecular structure. Tannins may act on the cell wall and across the cell membrane because they can precipitate proteins [19,26]. They may also suppress many enzymes such as gycosyltransferases [26]. Reddy et al [17] and Naz et al [22] demonstrated that gallic acid (a tannic acid) has the highest antibacterial effect against tested sensitive strains even at low concentrations. Hence, the antibacterial activity of Punica granatum may be related to polyphenol structures because polyphenols may affect the bacterial cell wall, inhibit enzymes by oxidized agents, interact with proteins and disturb co-aggregation of microorganisms [22,26]. In the present study, the extract of Punica granatum peel did not have an effect on C. albicans in all concentrations. This finding is in agreement with Singh’s study [27], but is in disagreement with the report of Vasconcelos et al [26] and Duraipandiyan et al [4]. Vasconcelos et al showed that Punica granatum may be used as a topical antifungal drug against C. albicans in two reports [19,26]. The real mechanism of the antifungal effect of tannins (the major components of Punica granatum extract) against Candida albicans is not clear; however, it may be related to their toxicity, astringent, molecular structure or other ways [19,26]. Furthermore, in the present study Punica granatum extract had no effect on the growth of A. viscosus. It may be related to the fact that gram positive bacteria such as Actynomyces, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus are more sensitive against antibacterial agents compared to gram negative bacteria because of the difference in their cell wall structures [27]. In the present study, we have used the disk diffusion method for the antimicrobial evaluation of MEPGP; however, the MIC method (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) applied along with disk diffusion may be recommended in future studies.
CONCLUSION
Many herbs have preventive or therapeutic potentials. Therefore, further studies are required to find these effects in order to replace synthetic medications with natural remedies. According to the results of this study, the extract of Punica granatum might be used in the control of common oral pathogens responsible for caries, stomatitis and periodontal diseases. On the other hand, further photochemical studies are required to determine the type of compounds responsible for the antibacterial effect of pomegranate.
Authors: Thaís Honório Lins Bernardo; Regina Célia Sales Santos Veríssimo; Valter Alvino; Maria Gabriella Silva Araujo; Raíssa Fernanda Evangelista Pires dos Santos; Max Denisson Maurício Viana; Maria Lysete de Assis Bastos; Magna Suzana Alexandre-Moreira; João Xavier de Araújo-Júnior Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2015-06-03