RATIONALE: Despite intense interest in strategies to predict which kinase inhibitor (KI) cancer therapeutics may be associated with cardiotoxicity, current approaches are inadequate. Sorafenib is a KI of concern because it inhibits growth factor receptors and Raf-1/B-Raf, kinases that are upstream of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) and signal cardiomyocyte survival in the setting of stress. OBJECTIVES: To explore the potential use of zebrafish as a preclinical model to predict cardiotoxicity and to determine whether sorafenib has associated cardiotoxicity, and, if so, define the mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: We find that the zebrafish model is readily able to discriminate a KI with little or no cardiotoxicity (gefitinib) from one with demonstrated cardiotoxicity (sunitinib). Sorafenib, like sunitinib, leads to cardiomyocyte apoptosis, a reduction in total myocyte number per heart, contractile dysfunction, and ventricular dilatation in zebrafish. In cultured rat cardiomyocytes, sorafenib induces cell death. This can be rescued by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of constitutively active MEK1, which restores ERK activity even in the presence of sorafenib. Whereas growth factor-induced activation of ERKs requires Raf, α-adrenergic agonist-induced activation of ERKs does not require it. Consequently, activation of α-adrenergic signaling markedly decreases sorafenib-induced cell death. Consistent with these in vitro data, inhibition of α-adrenergic signaling with the receptor antagonist prazosin worsens sorafenib-induced cardiomyopathy in zebrafish. CONCLUSIONS: Zebrafish may be a valuable preclinical tool to predict cardiotoxicity. The α-adrenergic signaling pathway is an important modulator of sorafenib cardiotoxicity in vitro and in vivo and appears to act through a here-to-fore unrecognized signaling pathway downstream of α-adrenergic activation that bypasses Raf to activate ERKs.
RATIONALE: Despite intense interest in strategies to predict which kinase inhibitor (KI) cancer therapeutics may be associated with cardiotoxicity, current approaches are inadequate. Sorafenib is a KI of concern because it inhibits growth factor receptors and Raf-1/B-Raf, kinases that are upstream of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) and signal cardiomyocyte survival in the setting of stress. OBJECTIVES: To explore the potential use of zebrafish as a preclinical model to predict cardiotoxicity and to determine whether sorafenib has associated cardiotoxicity, and, if so, define the mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: We find that the zebrafish model is readily able to discriminate a KI with little or no cardiotoxicity (gefitinib) from one with demonstrated cardiotoxicity (sunitinib). Sorafenib, like sunitinib, leads to cardiomyocyte apoptosis, a reduction in total myocyte number per heart, contractile dysfunction, and ventricular dilatation in zebrafish. In cultured rat cardiomyocytes, sorafenib induces cell death. This can be rescued by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of constitutively active MEK1, which restores ERK activity even in the presence of sorafenib. Whereas growth factor-induced activation of ERKs requires Raf, α-adrenergic agonist-induced activation of ERKs does not require it. Consequently, activation of α-adrenergic signaling markedly decreases sorafenib-induced cell death. Consistent with these in vitro data, inhibition of α-adrenergic signaling with the receptor antagonist prazosin worsens sorafenib-induced cardiomyopathy in zebrafish. CONCLUSIONS:Zebrafish may be a valuable preclinical tool to predict cardiotoxicity. The α-adrenergic signaling pathway is an important modulator of sorafenibcardiotoxicity in vitro and in vivo and appears to act through a here-to-fore unrecognized signaling pathway downstream of α-adrenergic activation that bypasses Raf to activate ERKs.
Authors: D J Slamon; B Leyland-Jones; S Shak; H Fuchs; V Paton; A Bajamonde; T Fleming; W Eiermann; J Wolter; M Pegram; J Baselga; L Norton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Walter Fiedler; Hubert Serve; Hartmut Döhner; Michael Schwittay; Oliver G Ottmann; Anne-Marie O'Farrell; Carlo L Bello; Randy Allred; William C Manning; Julie M Cherrington; Sharianne G Louie; Weiru Hong; Nicoletta M Brega; Giorgio Massimini; Paul Scigalla; Wolfgang E Berdel; Dieter K Hossfeld Journal: Blood Date: 2004-09-30 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Anand P Singh; Michael S Glennon; Prachi Umbarkar; Manisha Gupte; Cristi L Galindo; Qinkun Zhang; Thomas Force; Jason R Becker; Hind Lal Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Kiran Musunuru; Daniel Bernstein; F Sessions Cole; Mustafa K Khokha; Frank S Lee; Shin Lin; Thomas V McDonald; Ivan P Moskowitz; Thomas Quertermous; Vijay G Sankaran; David A Schwartz; Edwin K Silverman; Xiaobo Zhou; Ahmed A K Hasan; Xiao-Zhong James Luo Journal: Circ Genom Precis Med Date: 2018-04
Authors: Catharina Ruppert; Katharina Deiss; Sebastian Herrmann; Marie Vidal; Mehmet Oezkur; Armin Gorski; Frank Weidemann; Martin J Lohse; Kristina Lorenz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 11.205