Literature DB >> 21997898

Limitations of current definitions of miscarriage using mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length measurements: a multicenter observational study.

Y Abdallah1, A Daemen, E Kirk, A Pexsters, O Naji, C Stalder, D Gould, S Ahmed, S Guha, S Syed, C Bottomley, D Timmerman, T Bourne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is significant variation in cut-off values for mean gestational sac diameter (MSD) and embryo crown-rump length (CRL) used to define miscarriage, values suggested in the literature ranging from 13 to 25 mm for MSD and from 3 to 8 mm for CRL. We aimed to define the false-positive rate (FPR) for the diagnosis of miscarriage associated with different CRL and MSD measurements with or without a yolk sac in a large study population of patients attending early pregnancy clinics. We also aimed to define cut-off values for CRL and MSD that, on the basis of a single measurement, can definitively diagnose a miscarriage and so exclude possible inadvertent termination of pregnancy.
METHODS: This was an observational cross-sectional study. Data were collected prospectively according to a predefined protocol. Intrauterine pregnancy of uncertain viability (IPUV) was defined as an empty gestational sac or sac with a yolk sac but no embryo seen with MSD < 20 or < 30 mm or an embryo with an absent heartbeat and CRL < 6 mm or < 8 mm. We recruited to the study 1060 consecutive women with IPUV. The endpoint was presence or absence of a viable pregnancy at the time of first-trimester screening ultrasonography between 11 and 14 weeks. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for potential cut-off values to define miscarriage from MSD 8 to 30 mm with or without a yolk sac and from CRL 3 to 8 mm.
RESULTS: Of the 1060 women with a diagnosis of IPUV, 473 remained viable and 587 were non-viable by the time of the 11-14-week scan. In the absence of both embryo and yolk sac, the FPR for miscarriage was 4.4% when an MSD cut-off of 16 mm was used and 0.5% for a cut-off of 20 mm. There were no false-positive test results for miscarriage when a cut-off of MSD ≥ 21 mm was used. If a yolk sac was present but an embryo was not, the FPR for miscarriage was 2.6% for an MSD cut-off of 16 mm and 0.4% for a cut-off of 20 mm, with no false-positive results when a cut-off of MSD ≥ 21 mm was used. When an embryo was visible with an absent heartbeat, using a CRL cut-off of 4 mm the FPR for miscarriage was 8.3%, and for a CRL cut-off of 5 mm it was also 8.3%. There were no false-positive results using a CRL cut-off of ≥ 5.3 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: These data show that some current definitions used to diagnose miscarriage are potentially unsafe. Current national guidelines should be reviewed to avoid inadvertent termination of wanted pregnancies. An MSD cut-off of > 25 mm and a CRL cut-off of > 7 mm could be introduced to minimize the risk of a false-positive diagnosis of miscarriage.
Copyright © 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21997898     DOI: 10.1002/uog.10109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  13 in total

1.  Re-examining Sonographic Cut-off Values for Diagnosing Early Pregnancy Loss.

Authors:  Jennifer Bickhaus; Erin Perry; Danny J Schust
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale)       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Diagnostic Methods of Ectopic Pregnancy and Early Pregnancy Loss: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  A Hamza; G Meyberg-Solomayer; I Juhasz-Böss; R Joukhadar; Z Takacs; E-F Solomayer; S Baum; J Radosa; L Mavrova; D Herr
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  Rationalising the change in defining non-viability in the first trimester.

Authors:  Fernando Infante; Ishwari Casikar; Uche Menakaya; George Condous
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 4.  Problems of modern approaches to management of early pregnancy failure.

Authors:  Müberra Namlı Kalem; Ziya Kalem; Ebru Yüce; Ayla Eser; Zehra Candan İltemir Duvan
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 5.  Factors to consider in pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Shabnam Bobdiwala; Maya Al-Memar; Jessica Farren; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-29

6.  Validation of serum progesterone <35nmol/L as a predictor of miscarriage among women with threatened miscarriage.

Authors:  Sze Min Lek; Chee Wai Ku; John C Allen; Rahul Malhotra; Nguan Soon Tan; Truls Østbye; Thiam Chye Tan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  The association between vaginal bacterial composition and miscarriage: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  M Al-Memar; S Bobdiwala; H Fourie; R Mannino; Y S Lee; A Smith; J R Marchesi; D Timmerman; T Bourne; P R Bennett; D A MacIntyre
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Abnormal rate of human chorionic gonadotropin rise: a case series of patients with viable intrauterine pregnancies after embryo transfer.

Authors:  Lauren Kendall Rauchfuss; Alessandra J Ainsworth; Chandra C Shenoy
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-02-11

9.  Defining safe criteria to diagnose miscarriage: prospective observational multicentre study.

Authors:  Jessica Preisler; Julia Kopeika; Laure Ismail; Veluppillai Vathanan; Jessica Farren; Yazan Abdallah; Parijat Battacharjee; Caroline Van Holsbeke; Cecilia Bottomley; Deborah Gould; Susanne Johnson; Catriona Stalder; Ben Van Calster; Judith Hamilton; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-09-23

10.  Gestational hormone trajectories and early pregnancy failure: a reassessment.

Authors:  Paul G Whittaker; Courtney A Schreiber; Mary D Sammel
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.