Literature DB >> 21997781

Surgical technique: aperture fixation in PCL reconstruction: applying biomechanics to surgery.

Thomas J Gill1, Samuel K Van de Velde, Kaitlin M Carroll, William J Robertson, Benton E Heyworth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies suggest reducing the effective graft length during transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction by augmenting the distal tibial fixation with a proximal screw near the tibial tunnel aperture could increase graft stiffness and provide a more stable reconstruction. However, it remains unknown to what extent this mechanical theory influences in vivo graft performance over time. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: We developed a technique to augment tibial distal fixation with a proximal screw near the tibial tunnel aperture to shorten the effective graft length and increase graft stiffness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all 10 patients who had isolated PCL reconstructions with combined distal and proximal tibial fixation from 2003 to 2007. Mean age of the patients was 36.5 years. We measured ROM and obtained Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Lysholm scores. Anteroposterior stability was evaluated with a KT-2000 arthrometer. Minimum followup was 1 year (mean, 2.5 years; range, 1-4.8 years).
RESULTS: Mean Tegner scores before injury and at last followup were 7.3 and 6.5, respectively. Mean postoperative IKDC score was 87 versus a preoperative IKDC score of 43. Mean Lysholm score was 89 at last followup. All patients achieved full terminal extension. No patient had greater than a 5-mm difference in anterior or posterior displacement from the contralateral knee as measured by a KT-2000 arthrometer postoperatively (0.93 ± 0.79 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, augmentation of tibial distal fixation with a proximal screw near the tibial tunnel aperture during reconstruction of the isolated PCL rupture restored function, motion, and stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21997781      PMCID: PMC3270196          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2100-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  35 in total

1.  Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one- vs. two-tunnel technique.

Authors:  Thomas Houe; Uffe Jørgensen
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques.

Authors:  Jong-Keun Seon; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single- and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques.

Authors:  John A Bergfeld; Scott M Graham; Richard D Parker; Antonio D C Valdevit; Helen E Kambic
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Hatayama; Hiroshi Higuchi; Masashi Kimura; Yasukazu Kobayashi; Hiroto Asagumo; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2006-12

Review 5.  Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  K R Schulte; E T Chu; F H Fu
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.182

6.  Isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Long-term results.

Authors:  A B Lipscomb; A F Anderson; E D Norwig; W D Hovis; D L Brown
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Long-term results of isolated anterolateral bundle reconstructions of the posterior cruciate ligament: a 6- to 12-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Stijn Hermans; Kristoff Corten; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Long-term followup of the untreated isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.

Authors:  M D Boynton; B R Tietjens
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics after reconstruction of an isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury: in vivo analysis during lunge.

Authors:  Thomas J Gill; Samuel K Van de Velde; David W Wing; Luke S Oh; Ali Hosseini; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Effect of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on in vivo translation and rotation of the knee during weightbearing flexion.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Ramprasad Papannagari; Meng Li; Jeffrey Bingham; Kyung W Nha; Dain Allred; Thomas Gill
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Young-Soo Shin; Hyun-Jung Kim; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  What Is the Maximum Tibial Tunnel Angle for Transtibial PCL Reconstruction? A Comparison Based on Virtual Radiographs, CT Images, and 3D Knee Models.

Authors:  Yuanjun Teng; Lijun Da; Gengxin Jia; Jie Hu; Zhongcheng Liu; Shifeng Zhang; Hua Han; Yayi Xia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  REHABILITATION FOLLOWING ISOLATED POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW OF PUBLISHED PROTOCOLS.

Authors:  Matthew Senese; Elliot Greenberg; J Todd Lawrence; Theodore Ganley
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

Review 4.  [The killer turn in the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: mechanism and improvement].

Authors:  Yipeng Lin; Wufeng Cai; Xihao Huang; Jian Li; Qi Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.