Literature DB >> 21997691

Identification of Gleason pattern 5 on prostatic needle core biopsy: frequency of underdiagnosis and relation to morphology.

Daniel A Fajardo1, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Jeremy S Miller, Thomas K Lee, Jonathan I Epstein.   

Abstract

The presence of a Gleason pattern 5 prostatic adenocarcinoma is associated with a worse outcome. This study assesses the accuracy of grading a tumor as having Gleason pattern 5 and the potential factors contributing to its undergrading. From the consultation service of one of the authors, we identified 59 consecutive needle biopsy cases comprising 138 parts that, upon review, were graded as having Gleason pattern 5. All cases were reported as the final diagnosis by the outside pathologist. They were sent for a second opinion at the behest of clinicians or patients and not because the pathologist was seeking a second opinion. Considering the highest Gleason score in a given multicore specimen as the overall Gleason score, Gleason pattern 5 was missed in 34 of 59 (57.6%) cases by the outside pathologist. Compared with the outside pathologist's diagnosis, the Gleason score rendered at the second opinion was increased in 101 of 138 (73.2%) parts, was decreased in 5 of 138 (3.6%) parts, and remained unchanged in 32 of 138 (23.2%) parts. Gleason pattern 5 was not identified by the initiating pathologist in 67 of 138 (48.6%) of the evaluated parts. The architectural patterns of pattern 5 were as follows: single cells (n=104, 75.3%); solid sheets (n=69, 50%); cords (n=62, 44.9%); and comedonecrosis (n=3, 2.2%). Pattern 5 was missed more frequently when it was not the primary pattern. The most common Gleason pattern 5 architectural type was single cells and the least common was comedonecrosis. None of the architectural patterns appeared to be more correctly identified than the others; however, the most accurate grading was when the primary pattern was 5 and was composed mostly of solid sheets. Owing to the important prognostic and therapeutic implications of Gleason pattern 5, pathologists must be attuned to its varied patterns and to the fact that it may often represent a secondary or tertiary component of the carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21997691     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318228571d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  8 in total

1.  Comedonecrosis Revisited: Strong Association With Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate.

Authors:  Samson W Fine; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Satish K Tickoo; Victor E Reuter
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Histopathological Study of the Prostate Cancer Growth Patterns in Relation with the Grading Systems.

Authors:  Tudor Cristian Timotei Popescu; Alex Emilian Stepan; Mirela Marinela Florescu; Cristiana Eugenia Simionescu
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2022-03-31

3.  Evaluation of tumor morphologies and association with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in grade group 5 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Trevor A Flood; Nicola Schieda; Jordan Sim; Rodney H Breau; Chris Morash; Eric C Belanger; Susan J Robertson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  [Diagnostic histopathology of prostate cancer].

Authors:  G Kristiansen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Impact of Pathology Review for Decision Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Pedro Luiz Serrano Usón; Ricardo Silvestre E Silva Macarenco; Fernando Nunes Oliveira; Oren Smaletz
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Pathol       Date:  2017-11-02

6.  The importance of histopathologic review of biopsies in patients with prostate cancer referred to a tertiary uro-oncology center.

Authors:  Wagner Eduardo Matheus; Ubirajara Ferreira; Elimilson A Brandão; Aline A Ferruccio; Athanase Billis
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Contemporary seminal vesicle invasion rates in NCCN high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Rocco S Flammia; Benedikt Hoeh; Gabriele Sorce; Francesco Chierigo; Lukas Hohenhorst; Zhen Tian; Jordan A Goyal; Costantino Leonardo; Alberto Briganti; Markus Graefen; Carlo Terrone; Fred Saad; Shahrokh F Shariat; Francesco Montorsi; Felix K H Chun; Michele Gallucci; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.012

Review 8.  Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: current state and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Jennifer Gordetsky; Jonathan Epstein
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.644

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.