Literature DB >> 21997437

The cages, dynamics, and structuring of incipient methane clathrate hydrates.

Matthew R Walsh1, J Daniel Rainey, Patrick G Lafond, Da-Hye Park, Gregg T Beckham, Michael D Jones, Kun-Hong Lee, Carolyn A Koh, E Dendy Sloan, David T Wu, Amadeu K Sum.   

Abstract

Interest in describing clathrate hydrate formation mechanisms spans multiple fields of science and technical applications. Here, we report findings from multiple molecular dynamics simulations of spontaneous methane clathrate hydrate nucleation and growth from fully demixed and disordered two-phase fluid systems of methane and water. Across a range of thermodynamic conditions and simulation geometries and sizes, a set of seven cage types comprises approximately 95% of all cages formed in the nucleated solids. This set includes the ubiquitous 5(12) cage, the 5(12)6(n) subset (where n ranges from 2-4), and the 4(1)5(10)6(n) subset (where n also ranges from 2-4). Transformations among these cages occur via water pair insertions/removals and rotations, and may elucidate the mechanisms of solid-solid structural rearrangements observed experimentally. Some consistency is observed in the relative abundance of cages among all nucleation trajectories. 5(12) cages are always among the two most abundant cage types in the nucleated solids and are usually the most abundant cage type. In all simulations, the 5(12)6(n) cages outnumber their 4(1)5(10)6(n) counterparts with the same number of water molecules. Within these consistent features, some stochasticity is observed in certain cage ratios and in the long-range ordering of the nucleated solids. Even when comparing simulations performed at the same conditions, some trajectories yield swaths of multiple adjacent sI unit cells and long-range order over 5 nm, while others yield only isolated sI unit cells and little long-range order. The nucleated solids containing long-range order have higher 5(12)6(2)/5(12) and 5(12)6(3)/4(1)5(10)6(2) cage ratios when compared to systems that nucleate with little long-range order. The formation of multiple adjacent unit cells of sI hydrate at high driving forces suggests an alternative or addition to the prevailing hydrate nucleation hypotheses which involve formation through amorphous intermediates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21997437     DOI: 10.1039/c1cp21899a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  6 in total

1.  Characterizing key features in the formation of ice and gas hydrate systems.

Authors:  Shuai Liang; Kyle Wm Hall; Aatto Laaksonen; Zhengcai Zhang; Peter G Kusalik
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Evidence from mixed hydrate nucleation for a funnel model of crystallization.

Authors:  Kyle Wm Hall; Sheelagh Carpendale; Peter G Kusalik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Unraveling nucleation pathway in methane clathrate formation.

Authors:  Liwen Li; Jie Zhong; Youguo Yan; Jun Zhang; Jiafang Xu; Joseph S Francisco; Xiao Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A Theoretical Study of the Hydration of Methane, from the Aqueous Solution to the sI Hydrate-Liquid Water-Gas Coexistence.

Authors:  Daniel Porfirio Luis; Alcione García-González; Humberto Saint-Martin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Hydrophobic Hydration and the Effect of NaCl Salt in the Adsorption of Hydrocarbons and Surfactants on Clathrate Hydrates.

Authors:  Felipe Jiménez-Ángeles; Abbas Firoozabadi
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 14.553

6.  Encapsulation kinetics and dynamics of carbon monoxide in clathrate hydrate.

Authors:  Jinlong Zhu; Shiyu Du; Xiaohui Yu; Jianzhong Zhang; Hongwu Xu; Sven C Vogel; Timothy C Germann; Joseph S Francisco; Fujio Izumi; Koichi Momma; Yukihiko Kawamura; Changqing Jin; Yusheng Zhao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.