Literature DB >> 21997207

Chromosome missegregation in human cells arises through specific types of kinetochore-microtubule attachment errors.

Sarah L Thompson1, Duane A Compton.   

Abstract

Most solid tumors are aneuploid, and many missegregate chromosomes at high rates in a phenomenon called chromosomal instability (CIN). CIN reflects the erosion of mitotic fidelity, and it correlates with poor patient prognosis and drug resistance. The most common mechanism causing CIN is the persistence of improper kinetochore-microtubule attachments called merotely. Chromosomes with merotelic kinetochores often manifest as lagging chromosomes in anaphase, suggesting that lagging chromosomes fail to segregate properly. However, it remains unknown whether the lagging chromosomes observed in anaphase segregate to the correct or incorrect daughter cell. To address this question, we tracked the segregation of a single human chromosome during cell division by using LacI-GFP to target an integrated LacO array. By scoring the distribution of each sister chromatid during mitosis, we show that a majority of lagging chromosomes in anaphase segregate to the correct daughter cell. Instead, sister chromatids that segregate erroneously frequently do so without obvious evidence of lagging during anaphase. This outcome is expected if sister kinetochores on a chromosome bind microtubules oriented toward the same spindle pole, and we find evidence for syntelic kinetochore attachments in cells after treatments that increase missegregation rates. Thus, lagging chromosomes in anaphase are symptomatic of defects in kinetochore-microtubule attachment dynamics that cause chromosome missegregation associated with CIN, but the laggards rarely missegregate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21997207      PMCID: PMC3207692          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109720108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  TOGp, the human homolog of XMAP215/Dis1, is required for centrosome integrity, spindle pole organization, and bipolar spindle assembly.

Authors:  Lynne Cassimeris; Justin Morabito
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 2.  Mechanisms of chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Sarah L Thompson; Samuel F Bakhoum; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Deviant kinetochore microtubule dynamics underlie chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Giulio Genovese; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion.

Authors:  A F Straight; A S Belmont; C C Robinett; A W Murray
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Sarah L Thompson; Duane A Compton
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Chromosomal instability confers intrinsic multidrug resistance.

Authors:  Alvin J X Lee; David Endesfelder; Andrew J Rowan; Axel Walther; Nicolai J Birkbak; P Andrew Futreal; Julian Downward; Zoltan Szallasi; Ian P M Tomlinson; Michael Howell; Maik Kschischo; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  In vivo localization of DNA sequences and visualization of large-scale chromatin organization using lac operator/repressor recognition.

Authors:  C C Robinett; A Straight; G Li; C Willhelm; G Sudlow; A Murray; A S Belmont
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells.

Authors:  D Cimini; B Howell; P Maddox; A Khodjakov; F Degrassi; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04-30       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Chromosomal instability correlates with poor outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes irrespectively of the cytogenetic risk group.

Authors:  Christoph E Heilig; Harald Löffler; Ulrich Mahlknecht; Johannes W G Janssen; Anthony D Ho; Anna Jauch; Alwin Krämer
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  The KinI kinesin Kif2a is required for bipolar spindle assembly through a functional relationship with MCAK.

Authors:  Neil J Ganem; Duane A Compton
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-08-09       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  116 in total

1.  Lagging chromosomes entrapped in micronuclei are not 'lost' by cells.

Authors:  Yun Huang; Long Jiang; Qiyi Yi; Lei Lv; Zheng Wang; Xiaoyu Zhao; Liangwen Zhong; Hanwei Jiang; Salma Rasool; Qiaomei Hao; Zongyou Guo; Howard J Cooke; Michael Fenech; Qinghua Shi
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 2.  Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis.

Authors:  Kozo Tanaka
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Micronucleus formation causes perpetual unilateral chromosome inheritance in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Cayetana Vázquez-Diez; Kazuo Yamagata; Shardul Trivedi; Jenna Haverfield; Greg FitzHarris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Centrosomes in spindle organization and chromosome segregation: a mechanistic view.

Authors:  Patrick Meraldi
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Chromosomal instability upregulates interferon in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ning Jin; Robert F Lera; Rachel E Yan; Fen Guo; Kim Oxendine; Vanessa L Horner; Yang Hu; Jun Wan; Ryan J Mattison; Beth A Weaver; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Reduced ability to recover from spindle disruption and loss of kinetochore spindle assembly checkpoint proteins in oocytes from aged mice.

Authors:  Yan Yun; Janet E Holt; Simon I R Lane; Eileen A McLaughlin; Julie A Merriman; Keith T Jones
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 7.  Centrosome amplification: a suspect in breast cancer and racial disparities.

Authors:  Angela Ogden; Padmashree C G Rida; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 8.  Linked in: formation and regulation of microtubule attachments during chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Dhanya K Cheerambathur; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 8.382

9.  Chromosome Segregation Fidelity in Epithelia Requires Tissue Architecture.

Authors:  Kristin A Knouse; Kristina E Lopez; Marc Bachofner; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  HP1-Assisted Aurora B Kinase Activity Prevents Chromosome Segregation Errors.

Authors:  Yusuke Abe; Kosuke Sako; Kentaro Takagaki; Youko Hirayama; Kazuhiko S K Uchida; Jacob A Herman; Jennifer G DeLuca; Toru Hirota
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 12.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.