Literature DB >> 21997195

Radiobiological evaluation of the radiation dose as used in high-precision radiotherapy: effect of prolonged delivery time and applicability of the linear-quadratic model.

Yuta Shibamoto1, Shinya Otsuka, Hiromitsu Iwata, Chikao Sugie, Hiroyuki Ogino, Natsuo Tomita.   

Abstract

Since the dose delivery pattern in high-precision radiotherapy is different from that in conventional radiation, radiobiological assessment of the physical dose used in stereotactic irradiation and intensity-modulated radiotherapy has become necessary. In these treatments, the daily dose is usually given intermittently over a time longer than that used in conventional radiotherapy. During prolonged radiation delivery, sublethal damage repair takes place, leading to the decreased effect of radiation. This phenomenon is almost universarily observed in vitro. In in vivo tumors, however, this decrease in effect can be counterbalanced by rapid reoxygenation, which has been demonstrated in a laboratory study. Studies on reoxygenation in human tumors are warranted to better evaluate the influence of prolonged radiation delivery. Another issue related to radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is the mathematical model for dose evaluation and conversion. Many clinicians use the linear-quadratic (LQ) model and biologically effective dose (BED) to estimate the effects of various radiation schedules, but it has been suggested that the LQ model is not applicable to high doses per fraction. Recent experimental studies verified the inadequacy of the LQ model in converting hypofractionated doses into single doses. The LQ model overestimates the effect of high fractional doses of radiation. BED is particularly incorrect when it is used for tumor responses in vivo, since it does not take reoxygenation into account. For normal tissue responses, improved models have been proposed, but, for in vivo tumor responses, the currently available models are not satisfactory, and better ones should be proposed in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21997195     DOI: 10.1269/jrr.11095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  33 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of single or oligo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for head and neck tumors using micromultileaf collimator-based dynamic conformal arcs.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Ohtakara; Shinya Hayashi; Keisuke Mizuta; Mitsuhiro Aoki; Kenichi Ando; Sunaho Okada; Yatsuji Ito; Hiroaki Hoshi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Outcome of three-fraction gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases according to fractionation scheme: preliminary results.

Authors:  Chiman Jeon; Kyung Rae Cho; Jung Won Choi; Doo-Sik Kong; Ho Jun Seol; Do-Hyun Nam; Jung-Il Lee
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Cerebral cyst formation following stereotactic ablative irradiation for non-nasopharyngeal head and neck malignancies: imaging findings and relevant dosimetric parameters.

Authors:  K Ohtakara; H Hoshi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Long-term results of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma: evaluation by the Cortina consensus.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Iwata; Kengo Sato; Ryutaro Nomura; Yusuke Tabei; Ichiro Suzuki; Naoki Yokota; Mitsuhiro Inoue; Seiji Ohta; Shozo Yamada; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Dose-volume histogram comparison between static 5-field IMRT with 18-MV X-rays and helical tomotherapy with 6-MV X-rays.

Authors:  Akihiro Hayashi; Yuta Shibamoto; Yukiko Hattori; Takeshi Tamura; Michio Iwabuchi; Shinya Otsuka; Chikao Sugie; Takeshi Yanagi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Clinical results of stereotactic body radiotherapy for Stage I small-cell lung cancer: a single institutional experience.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Shioyama; Katsumasa Nakamura; Tomonari Sasaki; Saiji Ohga; Tadamasa Yoshitake; Takeshi Nonoshita; Kaori Asai; Koutarou Terashima; Keiji Matsumoto; Hideki Hirata; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  In vitro and in vivo studies on radiobiological effects of prolonged fraction delivery time in A549 cells.

Authors:  Ling Jiang; Xiao-Peng Xiong; Chao-Su Hu; Zhou-Luo Ou; Guo-Pei Zhu; Hong-Mei Ying
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Prognostic factors for local control of stage I non-small cell lung cancer in stereotactic radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Yuko Shirata; Keiichi Jingu; Masashi Koto; Masaki Kubozono; Ken Takeda; Toshiyuki Sugawara; Noriyuki Kadoya; Haruo Matsushita
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Compatibility of the repairable-conditionally repairable, multi-target and linear-quadratic models in converting hypofractionated radiation doses to single doses.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Iwata; Naruhiro Matsufuji; Toshiyuki Toshito; Takashi Akagi; Shinya Otsuka; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  In silico analysis of cell cycle synchronisation effects in radiotherapy of tumour spheroids.

Authors:  Harald Kempf; Haralampos Hatzikirou; Marcus Bleicher; Michael Meyer-Hermann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.