Literature DB >> 21996649

QUAGOL: a guide for qualitative data analysis.

Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé1, Chris Gastmans, Els Bryon, Yvonne Denier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data analysis is a complex and contested part of the qualitative research process, which has received limited theoretical attention. Researchers are often in need of useful instructions or guidelines on how to analyze the mass of qualitative data, but face the lack of clear guidance for using particular analytic methods.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to propose and discuss the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL), a guide that was developed in order to be able to truly capture the rich insights of qualitative interview data.
METHOD: The article describes six major problems researchers are often struggling with during the process of qualitative data analysis. Consequently, the QUAGOL is proposed as a guide to facilitate the process of analysis. Challenges emerged and lessons learned from own extensive experiences with qualitative data analysis within the Grounded Theory Approach, as well as from those of other researchers (as described in the literature), were discussed and recommendations were presented. Strengths and pitfalls of the proposed method were discussed in detail.
RESULTS: The Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) offers a comprehensive method to guide the process of qualitative data analysis. The process consists of two parts, each consisting of five stages. The method is systematic but not rigid. It is characterized by iterative processes of digging deeper, constantly moving between the various stages of the process. As such, it aims to stimulate the researcher's intuition and creativity as optimal as possible.
CONCLUSION: The QUAGOL guide is a theory and practice-based guide that supports and facilitates the process of analysis of qualitative interview data. Although the method can facilitate the process of analysis, it cannot guarantee automatic quality. The skills of the researcher and the quality of the research team remain the most crucial components of a successful process of analysis. Additionally, the importance of constantly moving between the various stages throughout the research process cannot be overstated. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21996649     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  111 in total

Review 1.  Stigma in patients with schizophrenia receiving community mental health care: a review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Annelien Mestdagh; Bart Hansen
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Community Mental Health Care Providers' Understanding of Recovery Principles and Accounts of Directiveness with Consumers.

Authors:  Lawrence A Osborn; Catherine H Stein
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2017-12

3.  A Mixed-Method Analysis of Persisting Effects Associated with Positive Outcomes Following Ibogaine Detoxification.

Authors:  Alan K Davis; Elise Renn; Austin-Marley Windham-Herman; Martin Polanco; Joseph P Barsuglia
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2018-07-18

4.  Nurses' ethical reasoning in cases of physical restraint in acute elderly care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sabine Goethals; Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé; Chris Gastmans
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-11

5.  Patients' Perspectives on and Experiences of Home Exercise Programmes Delivered with a Mobile Application.

Authors:  Hillary Abramsky; Puneet Kaur; Mikale Robitaille; Leanna Taggio; Paul K Kosemetzky; Hillary Foster; Barbara E Gibson Bmr Pt MSc PhD; Maggie Bergeron; Patrick Jachyra
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Return to work following breast cancer treatment: the employers' side.

Authors:  Corine Tiedtke; Peter Donceel; Angelique de Rijk; Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-09

7.  "Clearly they are in the circle of care, but . . .": A qualitative study exploring perceptions of personal health information sharing with community pharmacists in an integrated care model.

Authors:  Teagan Rolf von den Baumen; Jennifer Lake; Amanda C Everall; Katie Dainty; Zahava Rosenberg-Yunger; Sara J T Guilcher
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2020-09-25

8.  A qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of deconditioning in hospital in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Sara J T Guilcher; Amanda C Everall; Lauren Cadel; Joyce Li; Kerry Kuluski
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Unraveling patients' readiness in advance care planning conversations: a qualitative study as part of the ACTION Study.

Authors:  M Zwakman; M M Milota; A van der Heide; L J Jabbarian; I J Korfage; J A C Rietjens; J J M van Delden; M C Kars
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Daily life participation in childhood chronic disease: a qualitative study on the child's and parent's perspective.

Authors:  Merel M Nap-van der Vlist; Emma E Berkelbach van der Sprenkel; Linde N Nijhof; Martha A Grootenhuis; Cornelis K van der Ent; Joost F Swart; Annet van Royen-Kerkhof; Martine van Grotel; Elise M van de Putte; Sanne L Nijhof; Marijke C Kars
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.