Literature DB >> 2199620

Intraperitoneal carboplatin: favorable results in women with minimal residual ovarian cancer after cisplatin therapy.

J L Speyer1, U Beller, N Colombo, J Sorich, J C Wernz, H Hochster, M Green, R Porges, F M Muggia, R Canetta.   

Abstract

From August 1985 to November 1989 we conducted a trial of intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin including a dose-escalation design in 25 women with advanced gynecologic malignancies. All had extensive prior therapy with cisplatin (median cumulative dose, 525 mg/m2). Carboplatin was administered IP in 2 L of 1.5% dextrose with a 4-hour dwell time every 4 weeks for six cycles at a starting dose of 200 mg/m2. Patients with reduced creatinine clearance (30 to 60 cc/min) were escalated more slowly than those with high (greater than 60 cc/min) clearance. Thrombocytopenia was dose-limiting and often more severe in patients with compromised renal function; there was no local drug toxicity. The median time of follow-up is 25 months. Complete responses (CRs) were documented in six of 23 assessable patients (26%) by repeat laparotomy, and an additional 11 patients (48%) had no disease evident by noninvasive restaging. Five of the CRs and six of the patients with no clinically evident disease have relapsed from 3 to 40 months after therapy. Six patients (26%) are alive and free of disease 8 to 47 (median, 20) months after therapy. IP carboplatin is effective against relapsed ovarian cancer, even after prior cisplatin therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2199620     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.8.1335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Csilla Hasovits; Stephen Clarke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  PK/TD modeling for prediction of the effects of 8C2, an anti-topotecan mAb, on topotecan-induced toxicity in mice.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.875

3.  Proceedings of a GOG workshop on intraperitoneal therapy for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D S Alberts; M Markman; F Muggia; R F Ozols; E Eldermire; M A Bookman; T Chen; J Curtin; L M Hess; L Liebes; R C Young; E Trimble
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Survival after second-line intraperitoneal therapy for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience.

Authors:  Maurie Markman; Mark Brady; Alan Hutson; Jonathan S Berek
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Phase II evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and debulking followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy in women with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer: Southwest Oncology Group Study S0009.

Authors:  Amy D Tiersten; P Y Liu; Harriet O Smith; Sharon P Wilczynski; William R Robinson; Maurie Markman; David S Alberts
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of ovarian cancer: focus on carboplatin.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal carboplatin and etoposide.

Authors:  E F McClay; R Goel; P Andrews; S Gorelick; S Kirmani; S Kim; P Braly; S Plaxe; S Hoff; J Alcaraz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Potentiation of cis-diammine(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)platinum(II) by amphotericin B in BALB/c nude mice bearing human ovarian carcinoma cells.

Authors:  M Kojima; F Kikkawa; H Oguchi; K Tamakoshi; O Maeda; N Suganuma; Y Tomoda
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1994-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.