Literature DB >> 21996000

The influence of transient spatial attention on the processing of intracutaneous electrical stimuli examined with ERPs.

Rob H J Van der Lubbe1, Jan R Buitenweg, Maria Boschker, Bernard Gerdes, Marijtje L A Jongsma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine the influence of transient spatial attention on the processing of intracutaneous electrical stimuli.
METHODS: Electrical stimuli, a single pulse or five pulses, were presented at the index fingers of the left or right hand. The to-be-attended hand and stimulated finger varied randomly from trial to trial. Participants had to press a foot pedal only when the relevant stimulus, varied between participants, occurred at the attended hand. EEG was measured to extract relevant ERP components.
RESULTS: The N100 and N150 were enhanced for attended as compared to unattended stimuli. The N100, N150, P260, and the P500 were enlarged for five pulse as compared to single pulse stimuli. The P260, which is thought to reflect a call for attention, was enhanced for unattended as compared to attended stimuli. Source analyses indicate that attentional effects on the N100, N150, and P260 may be related to changes in activity in secondary somatosensory areas and the anterior cingulate cortex.
CONCLUSIONS: A transient manipulation of spatial attention increases cortical activity induced by attended relative to unattended intracutaneous electrical stimuli, but initially unattended stimuli appear to induce an enhanced orienting effect. SIGNIFICANCE: Initially unattended intracutaneous electrical stimuli seem to induce a call for attention.
Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21996000     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  8 in total

1.  Reproducibility of somatosensory spatial perceptual maps.

Authors:  Peter Steenbergen; Jan R Buitenweg; Jörg Trojan; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Altered reward processing in pathological computer gamers--ERP-results from a semi-natural gaming-design.

Authors:  Eva C P Duven; Kai W Müller; Manfred E Beutel; Klaus Wölfling
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Influence of transient spatial attention on the P3 component and perception of painful and non-painful electric stimuli in crossed and uncrossed hands positions.

Authors:  Karolina Świder; Eligiusz Wronka; Joukje M Oosterman; Clementina M van Rijn; Marijtje L A Jongsma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Expectation violation and attention to pain jointly modulate neural gain in somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Francesca Fardo; Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Micah Allen; Martin J Dietz; Andreas Roepstorff; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli.

Authors:  Casper H van Heck; Joukje M Oosterman; Kim M A de Kleijn; Marijtje L A Jongsma; Clementina M van Rijn
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Does mindfulness training modulate the influence of spatial attention on the processing of intracutaneous electrical stimuli?

Authors:  Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Elian De Kleine; Karlein M G Schreurs; Ernst T Bohlmeijer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Looking at the hand modulates the brain responses to nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory stimuli but does not necessarily modulate their perception.

Authors:  Diana M Torta; Valéry Legrain; André Mouraux
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Subject-level differences in reported locations of cutaneous tactile and nociceptive stimuli.

Authors:  Peter Steenbergen; Jan R Buitenweg; Jörg Trojan; Bart Klaassen; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.