Literature DB >> 21995673

Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test.

Pooja K Agarwal1, Henry L Roediger.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the influence of practice with, and the expectancy of, open-book tests (students viewed studied material while taking the test) versus closed-book tests (students completed the test without viewing the studied material) on delayed retention and transfer. Using GRE materials specifically designed for open-book testing, participants studied passages and then took initial open- or closed-book tests. Open-book testing led to better initial performance than closed-book testing, but on a delayed criterial (closed-book) test both types of testing produced similar retention after a two-day delay in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2 participants were informed in advance about the type of delayed criterial test to expect (open- or closed-book). Expecting an open-book test (relative to a closed-book test) decreased participants' time spent studying and their delayed test performance on closed-book comprehension and transfer tests, demonstrating that test expectancy can influence long-term learning. Expectancy of open-book tests may impair long-term retention and transfer compared to closed-book tests, despite superior initial performance on open-book tests and students' preference for open-book tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21995673     DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2011.613840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  5 in total

1.  The grass isn't always greener: perceptions of and performance on open-note exams.

Authors:  Brian K Sato; Wenliang He; Mark Warschauer; Pavan Kadandale
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Assessment of factual recall and higher-order cognitive domains in an open-book medical school examination.

Authors:  P F McLean; D J Davies; P R Kemp; A D Liddle; M J Morrell; O Halse; N M Martin; A H Sam
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Challenges of unrestricted assignment-based examinations (ABE) and restricted open-book examinations (OBE) during COVID-19 pandemic in India: An experimental comparison.

Authors:  Adnan Shakeel; Tasneem Shazli; Mohd Sadiq Salman; Hasan Raja Naqvi; Nafees Ahmad; Nazim Ali
Journal:  Hum Behav Emerg Technol       Date:  2021-10-21

4.  Evaluating open-note exams: Student perceptions and preparation methods in an undergraduate biology class.

Authors:  Emily P Driessen; Abby E Beatty; Cissy J Ballen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Testing Effect on High-Level Cognitive Skills.

Authors:  Jamie L Jensen; Mark A McDaniel; Tyler A Kummer; Patricia D D M Godoy; Bryn St Clair
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.325

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.