Literature DB >> 21994471

Application Of The American College Of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Recommendations And a Risk Stratification Score (OESIL) For Patients With Syncope Admitted From The Emergency Department.

Adrian Baranchuk1, William McIntyre, William Harper, Carlos A Morillo.   

Abstract

AIMS: The goals of this study were to apply the 2001 ACEP recommendations for admission to hospital after a syncopal event and to validate the OESIL risk stratification score, in patients with syncope admitted to a general internal medicine ward.
METHODS: A retrospective study applied the 2001 ACEP recommendations and OESIL score to all the patients admitted from the emergency department to a general internal medicine ward with a diagnosis of syncope during a 12-month period. The patients were classified as meeting criteria for 2001 ACEP class B or C recommendations and OESIL score 0-1 (low-risk for a major cardiac event) or 2-4 (high-risk for a major cardiac event). The sensitivity and specificity of each group for predicting high-risk patients was calculated.
RESULTS: After applying the 2001 ACEP recommendations to our population, 25% (19 patients) were classified as level B, whereas 68% of the patients were classified as Level C. Sensitivity for ACEP level B recommendations was 100% and specificity was 81%. The ACEP level C recommendations also had 100% sensitivity but markedly reduced specificity at 26%. An OESIL score of 0-1 points was calculated for 30.6% of the population, identifying them as low-risk. An OESIL score of 2-4 points was documented in the remaining 69.4% with a mortality risk of 20 % /year.
CONCLUSION: A significant proportion (30%) of patients presenting with syncope to a tertiary care University Hospital emergency department and admitted to an Internal Medicine ward were retrospectively classified as low-risk and could have potentially been managed as outpatients. Implementing current guidelines and clinical pathways for the management of syncope may improve this approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACEP recommendations; OESIL score; Syncope

Year:  2011        PMID: 21994471      PMCID: PMC3184449     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J        ISSN: 0972-6292


  17 in total

1.  Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope.

Authors:  M Brignole; P Alboni; D Benditt; L Bergfeldt; J J Blanc; P E Bloch Thomsen; J G van Dijk; A Fitzpatrick; S Hohnloser; J Janousek; W Kapoor; R A Kenny; P Kulakowski; A Moya; A Raviele; R Sutton; G Theodorakis; W Wieling
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Characteristics and admission patterns of patients presenting with syncope to U.S. emergency departments, 1992-2000.

Authors:  Benjamin C Sun; Jennifer A Emond; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Diagnostic criteria for vasovagal syncope based on a quantitative history.

Authors:  Robert Sheldon; Sarah Rose; Stuart Connolly; Debbie Ritchie; Mary-Lou Koshman; Michael Frenneaux
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope.

Authors:  J Stephen Huff; Wyatt W Decker; James V Quinn; Andrew D Perron; Anthony M Napoli; Suzanne Peeters; Andy S Jagoda
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Routine electrocardiogram and medical history in syncope: a simple approach can identify most high-risk patients.

Authors:  Marina Cerrone; Silvia G Priori
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Diagnosing syncope in clinical practice. Implementation of a simplified diagnostic algorithm in a multicentre prospective trial - the OESIL 2 study (Osservatorio Epidemiologico della Sincope nel Lazio)

Authors:  F Ammirati; F Colivicchi; M Santini
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Epidemiological characteristics and diagnostic approach in patients admitted to the emergency room for transient loss of consciousness: Group for Syncope Study in the Emergency Room (GESINUR) study.

Authors:  Gonzalo Baron-Esquivias; Jesús Martínez-Alday; Alfonso Martín; Angel Moya; Roberto García-Civera; M Paz López-Chicharro; María Martín-Mendez; Carmen del Arco; Pedro Laguna
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Syncope Evaluation in the Emergency Department Study (SEEDS): a multidisciplinary approach to syncope management.

Authors:  Win K Shen; Wyatt W Decker; Peter A Smars; Deepi G Goyal; Ann E Walker; David O Hodge; Jane M Trusty; Karen M Brekke; Arshad Jahangir; Peter A Brady; Thomas M Munger; Bernard J Gersh; Stephen C Hammill; Robert L Frye
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Risk stratification of patients with syncope in an accident and emergency department.

Authors:  S D Crane
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score.

Authors:  Furio Colivicchi; Fabrizio Ammirati; Domenico Melina; Vincenzo Guido; Giuseppe Imperoli; Massimo Santini
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.