Literature DB >> 21993351

Electrophysiological evidence for different effects of working memory load on interference control in adolescents than adults.

Marjolein Spronk1, Lisa M Jonkman.   

Abstract

The present study investigated how the development of interference control is influenced by the development of working memory (WM) capacity during adolescence. In a dual-task, 17 adolescents (12-16 years) and 19 adults (18-48 years) performed a gender word-face Stroop task, while WM-capacity was manipulated by a concurrently performed N-back task. Behavior (reaction times, % errors and % misses) and event-related potentials associated with the detection (N450) of the Stroop conflict and response selection (sustained positivity; SP) were measured without or with a concurrent WM load. Adolescents had lower accuracy on N-back and Stroop trials than adults. N450 results showed Stroop conflict above temporal-occipital cortex which was suggested to be caused by processing of distracter faces. This N450 conflict response was smaller in adults and only present when holding a simultaneous WM-load, whereas adolescents' N450 conflict responses were already present without a concurrent WM-load and did not further increase with load. These N450 results indicate poorer distracter suppression in adolescence which is suggested to be due to insufficient attentional resources for top-down control. Irrespective of WM-load, adolescents also had larger parietal SP conflict responses than adults, suggesting inefficient response selection in case of activation of two conflicting responses. The main conclusion is that adolescents have worse distracter suppression than adults, caused by lower availability of resources for top-down control.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993351     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  3 in total

1.  Dissociation of preparatory attention and response monitoring maturation during adolescence.

Authors:  M L Padilla; A Pfefferbaum; E V Sullivan; F C Baker; I M Colrain
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  A cognitive framework for understanding and improving interference resolution in the brain.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Joaquin A Anguera; David A Ziegler; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Low-arousal speech noise improves performance in N-back task: an ERP study.

Authors:  Longzhu Han; Yunzhe Liu; Dandan Zhang; Yi Jin; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.