Literature DB >> 21993166

Sensorimotor function, balance abilities and pain influence Timed Up and Go performance in older community-living people.

Marcella Mun-San Kwan1, Sang-I Lin, Ching-Huey Chen, Jacqueline C T Close, Stephen R Lord.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Timed up and Go Test (TUG) is recommended as a screening tool for fall risk in older people. It is assumed that this general mobility test is underpinned by physiological factors such as strength, coordination and balance. However, no studies have examined the range of physiological and psychological factors which influence performance on this test. The aim of this study was to examine the relative contributions of a range of sensorimotor, balance and psychological factors to TUG performance in a large sample of older people.
METHODS: 280 community-dwelling people aged 65 plus years (mean age 74.9, SD=6.4) underwent the TUG test, as well as quantitative tests of vision, peripheral sensation, strength, reaction time, balance, fear of falling, pain and vitality.
RESULTS: The time required to complete the TUG was significantly related to limitations in instrumental activities of daily living and fear of falling. Many physiological and psychological factors were significantly associated with TUG performance in univariate analyses. Stepwise multiple regression analyses identified knee strength, postural sway, reaction time, edge contrast sensitivity, MMSE score, SF12 body pain and general health scores, number of medical conditions and age as significant and independent predictors of TUG performance. Of these measures, the lower limb strength measure explained most variance in TUG times. However, other sensorimotor, balance, psychological and health measures provided important independent information. The combined set of variables explained 43.5% of the variance in TUG times (multiple r=0.65).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that, in community-dwelling older people, TUG performance is influenced by lower limb strength, balance, reaction time, vision and pain, in addition to cognitive function and health status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993166     DOI: 10.1007/bf03324960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  15 in total

1.  Interpreting the need for initial support to perform tandem stance tests of balance.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Hile; Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; David M Wert; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Stephanie A Studenski
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06-28

2.  Initiation gait variability is higher in the morning in elderly inpatients.

Authors:  Yosuke Ishii; Yuichiro Kai; Takashi Morita; Hisayoshi Aikawa; Ryoichi Nakamura
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2020-07-22

3.  Sensorimotor integration of vision and proprioception for obstacle crossing in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Raza Naseem Malik; Rachel Cote; Tania Lam
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The Relationships among Vitamin D Level, Balance, Muscle Strength, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Patients with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nurdan Korkmaz; Ahmet Tutoğlu; Izzet Korkmaz; Ahmet Boyacı
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-10-28

5.  Can You Ride a Bicycle? The Ability to Ride a Bicycle Prevents Reduced Social Function in Older Adults With Mobility Limitation.

Authors:  Ryota Sakurai; Hisashi Kawai; Hideyo Yoshida; Taro Fukaya; Hiroyuki Suzuki; Hunkyung Kim; Hirohiko Hirano; Kazushige Ihara; Shuichi Obuchi; Yoshinori Fujiwara
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.211

6.  Fear of falling in community-dwelling older adults: A cause of falls, a consequence, or both?

Authors:  Ana Lavedán; Maria Viladrosa; Pilar Jürschik; Teresa Botigué; Carmen Nuín; Olga Masot; Raquel Lavedán
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Aging effect on the instrumented Timed-Up-and-Go test variables in nursing home women aged 80-93 years.

Authors:  Ryszard Zarzeczny; Agnieszka Nawrat-Szołtysik; Anna Polak; Jakub Maliszewski; Adam Kiełtyka; Beata Matyja; Magdalena Dudek; Joanna Zborowska; Adam Wajdman
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.277

8.  The geriatric depression scale and the timed up and go test predict fear of falling in community-dwelling elderly women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bruno de Souza Moreira; Daniela Maria da Cruz Dos Anjos; Daniele Sirineu Pereira; Rosana Ferreira Sampaio; Leani Souza Máximo Pereira; Rosângela Corrêa Dias; Renata Noce Kirkwood
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Rationale and design of TransplantLines: a prospective cohort study and biobank of solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Michele F Eisenga; Antonio W Gomes-Neto; Marco van Londen; Aaltje L Ziengs; Rianne M Douwes; Suzanne P Stam; Maryse C J Osté; Tim J Knobbe; Niek R Hessels; Anne M Buunk; Coby Annema; Marion J Siebelink; Emoke Racz; Jacoba M Spikman; Frank A J A Bodewes; Robert A Pol; Stefan P Berger; Gea Drost; Robert J Porte; Henri G D Leuvenink; Kevin Damman; Erik A M Verschuuren; Vincent E de Meijer; Hans Blokzijl; Stephan J L Bakker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Key factors for the assessment of mobility in advanced dementia: A consensus approach.

Authors:  Karen Van Ooteghem; Kristin E Musselman; Avril Mansfield; David Gold; Meghan N Marcil; Ron Keren; Maria Carmela Tartaglia; Alastair J Flint; Andrea Iaboni
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2019-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.