OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that natural menopause would be related to better physical functioning compared with surgical menopause and that later age at menopause would be related to better physical functioning. METHODS: Our sample comprised 1,765 women 60 years or older who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, a cross-sectional study representative of the US population. Women recalled age at final menstrual period and age at removal of the uterus and ovaries and reported age, race and ethnicity, height, weight, educational attainment, smoking status, number of children, and use of estrogen therapy. Respondents completed a walk trial and chair rises and reported functional limitations. RESULTS: Women with surgical menopause had chair rise times that were an average of 4.4% slower than did those of women with natural menopause (95% CI, 0.56-8.27). Women with natural menopause at age 55 years or more had an average walking speed of 0.05 meters/second (95% CI, 0.01-0.10) faster than did women with natural menopause at age less than 45 years. Later ages at natural and surgical menopause were also related to lower self-reported functional limitation. Women with surgical menopause at age 55 years or more had odds of functional limitation 0.52 times (95% CI, 0.29-0.95) that of women with surgical menopause at age less than 40 years, with similar patterns for natural menopause. CONCLUSIONS: Women with surgical menopause and earlier age at menopause had worse physical function in older adulthood. These groups of women may benefit from interventions to prevent functional decline.
OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that natural menopause would be related to better physical functioning compared with surgical menopause and that later age at menopause would be related to better physical functioning. METHODS: Our sample comprised 1,765 women 60 years or older who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, a cross-sectional study representative of the US population. Women recalled age at final menstrual period and age at removal of the uterus and ovaries and reported age, race and ethnicity, height, weight, educational attainment, smoking status, number of children, and use of estrogen therapy. Respondents completed a walk trial and chair rises and reported functional limitations. RESULTS: Women with surgical menopause had chair rise times that were an average of 4.4% slower than did those of women with natural menopause (95% CI, 0.56-8.27). Women with natural menopause at age 55 years or more had an average walking speed of 0.05 meters/second (95% CI, 0.01-0.10) faster than did women with natural menopause at age less than 45 years. Later ages at natural and surgical menopause were also related to lower self-reported functional limitation. Women with surgical menopause at age 55 years or more had odds of functional limitation 0.52 times (95% CI, 0.29-0.95) that of women with surgical menopause at age less than 40 years, with similar patterns for natural menopause. CONCLUSIONS: Women with surgical menopause and earlier age at menopause had worse physical function in older adulthood. These groups of women may benefit from interventions to prevent functional decline.
Authors: Ebenezer O Babalola; Adil E Bharucha; Cathy D Schleck; John B Gebhart; Alan R Zinsmeister; L Joseph Melton Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Diana Kuh; E Joan Bassey; Suzanne Butterworth; Rebecca Hardy; Michael E J Wadsworth Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: D A Snowdon; R L Kane; W L Beeson; G L Burke; J M Sprafka; J Potter; H Iso; D R Jacobs; R L Phillips Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1989-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mary C Playdon; Michael B Bracken; Tara B Sanft; Jennifer A Ligibel; Maura Harrigan; Melinda L Irwin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Carolyn J Crandall; Michael J LaMonte; Beverly M Snively; Meryl S LeBoff; Jane A Cauley; Cora E Lewis; Robert Wallace; Wenjun Li; Zhao Chen; John A Robbins; Jean Wactawski-Wende Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Candace K McClure; Trang VoPham; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Barbara Sternfeld; Jane A Cauley; Naila Khalil; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Maria P Velez; Beatriz E Alvarado; Nicole Rosendaal; Saionara M da Câmara; Emmanuelle Belanger; Harriet Richardson; Catherine M Pirkle Journal: Menopause Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Sam Ibeneme; Chinenye Ezeigwe; Georgian C Ibeneme; Amarachi Ezuma; Ifeoma Okoye; Joseph M Nwankwo Journal: Curr Ther Res Clin Exp Date: 2017-03-30