Literature DB >> 21993040

Kinematic and kinetic analysis of maximal velocity deadlifts performed with and without the inclusion of chain resistance.

Paul A Swinton1, Arthur D Stewart, Justin W L Keogh, Ioannis Agouris, Ray Lloyd.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the deadlift could be effectively incorporated with explosive resistance training (ERT) and to investigate whether the inclusion of chains enhanced the suitability of the deadlift for ERT. Twenty-three resistance trained athletes performed the deadlift with 30, 50, and 70% 1-repetition maximum (1RM) loads at submaximal velocity, maximal velocity (MAX), and MAX with the inclusion of 2 chain loads equal to 20 or 40% of the subjects' 1RM. All trials were performed on force platforms with markers attached to the barbell to calculate velocity and acceleration using a motion capture system. Significant increases in force, velocity, power, rate of force development, and length of the acceleration phase (p < 0.05) were obtained when repetition velocity increased from submaximal to maximal. During MAX repetitions with a constant resistance, the mean length of the acceleration phase ranged from 73.2 (±7.2%) to 84.9 (±12.2%) of the overall movement. Compared to using a constant resistance, the inclusion of chains enabled greater force to be maintained to the end of the concentric action and significantly increased peak force and impulse (p < 0.05), while concurrently decreasing velocity, power, and rate of force development (p < 0.05). The effects of chains were influenced by the magnitude of the chain and barbell resistance, with greater increases and decreases in mechanical variables obtained when heavier chain and barbell loads were used. The results of the investigation suggest that the deadlift can be incorporated effectively in ERT programs. Coaches and athletes should be aware that the inclusion of heavy chains may have both positive and negative effects on kinematics and kinetics of an exercise.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993040     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212e389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

1.  Effect of Load on Peak Power of the Bar, Body and System during the Deadlift.

Authors:  Justin A Blatnik; Courtney L Goodman; Christopher R Capps; Olumide O Awelewa; Travis N Triplett; Travis M Erickson; Jeffery M McBride
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  The Acute Effects of Attaching Chains to the Barbell on Kinematics and Muscle Activation in Bench Press in Resistance-Trained Men.

Authors:  Roland van den Tillaar; Atle Hole Saeterbakken; Vidar Andersen
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance.

Authors:  Jason Lake; Freddie Duncan; Matt Jackson; David Naworynsky
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-24

4.  Acute Effects of Elastic Bands as Resistance or Assistance on EMG, Kinetics, and Kinematics During Deadlift in Resistance-Trained Men.

Authors:  Vidar Andersen; Helene Pedersen; Marius Steiro Fimland; Matthew Peter Shaw; Tom Erik Jorung Solstad; Nicolay Stien; Kristoffer Toldnes Cumming; Atle Hole Saeterbakken
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-11-05

5.  Acute effects of variable resistance training on force, velocity, and power measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lin Shi; Zhidong Cai; Sitong Chen; Dong Han
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 6.  Effects of Variable-Resistance Training Versus Constant-Resistance Training on Maximum Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yiguan Lin; Yangyang Xu; Feng Hong; Junbo Li; Weibing Ye; Mallikarjuna Korivi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men.

Authors:  Vidar Andersen; Marius S Fimland; Dag-Andrè Mo; Vegard M Iversen; Tommy M Larsen; Fredrik Solheim; Atle H Saeterbakken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.