BACKGROUND: Biologically targeted therapies have been postulated as a viable strategy to improve outcomes for women with ovarian cancer. We assessed the safety, tolerance, pharmacokinetics, relevant circulating and image-derived biomarkers, and clinical activity of combination aflibercept and docetaxel in this population. METHODS: For the phase 1 (pharmacokinetic) study, eligible patients had measurable, recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma with a maximum of two prior chemotherapy regimens. Aflibercept was administered intravenously over three dose levels (2, 4, or 6 mg/kg; one dose every 21 days) to identify the maximum tolerated dose for the phase 2 study. Pharmacokinetics were assessed and dynamic imaging was done during a lead-in phase with single-agent aflibercept (cycle 0) and during combination therapy with intravenous docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)). Eligibility for the phase 2 study was the same as for phase 1. Patients were enrolled in a two-stage design and given aflibercept 6 mg/kg intravenously and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. The trial has completed enrolment and all patients are now off study. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00436501. FINDINGS: From the phase 1 study, the recommended phase 2 doses of aflibercept and docetaxel were found to be 6 mg/kg and 75 mg/m(2), respectively. Log-linear pharmacokinetics (for unbound aflibercept) were observed for the three dose levels. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted. 46 evaluable patients were enrolled in the phase 2 trial; 33 were platinum resistant (15 refractory) and 13 were platinum sensitive. The confirmed ORR was 54% (25 of 46; 11 patients had a complete response and 14 had a partial response). Grade 3-4 toxicities observed in more than two patients (5%) were: neutropenia in 37 patients (80%); leucopenia in 25 patients (54%); fatigue in 23 patients (50%); dyspnoea in ten patients (22%); and stomatitis in three patients (7%). Adverse events specifically associated with aflibercept were grade 1-2 hypertension in five patients (11%), and grade 2 proteinuria in one patient (2%). INTERPRETATION: Combination aflibercept plus docetaxel can be safely administered at the dose and schedule reported here, and is associated with substantial antitumour activity. These findings suggest that further clinical development of this combination in ovarian cancer is warranted. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute, US Department of Defense, Sanofi-Aventis, Gynecologic Cancer Foundation, Marcus Foundation, and the Commonwealth Foundation.
BACKGROUND: Biologically targeted therapies have been postulated as a viable strategy to improve outcomes for women with ovarian cancer. We assessed the safety, tolerance, pharmacokinetics, relevant circulating and image-derived biomarkers, and clinical activity of combination aflibercept and docetaxel in this population. METHODS: For the phase 1 (pharmacokinetic) study, eligible patients had measurable, recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma with a maximum of two prior chemotherapy regimens. Aflibercept was administered intravenously over three dose levels (2, 4, or 6 mg/kg; one dose every 21 days) to identify the maximum tolerated dose for the phase 2 study. Pharmacokinetics were assessed and dynamic imaging was done during a lead-in phase with single-agent aflibercept (cycle 0) and during combination therapy with intravenous docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)). Eligibility for the phase 2 study was the same as for phase 1. Patients were enrolled in a two-stage design and given aflibercept 6 mg/kg intravenously and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. The trial has completed enrolment and all patients are now off study. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00436501. FINDINGS: From the phase 1 study, the recommended phase 2 doses of aflibercept and docetaxel were found to be 6 mg/kg and 75 mg/m(2), respectively. Log-linear pharmacokinetics (for unbound aflibercept) were observed for the three dose levels. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted. 46 evaluable patients were enrolled in the phase 2 trial; 33 were platinum resistant (15 refractory) and 13 were platinum sensitive. The confirmed ORR was 54% (25 of 46; 11 patients had a complete response and 14 had a partial response). Grade 3-4 toxicities observed in more than two patients (5%) were: neutropenia in 37 patients (80%); leucopenia in 25 patients (54%); fatigue in 23 patients (50%); dyspnoea in ten patients (22%); and stomatitis in three patients (7%). Adverse events specifically associated with aflibercept were grade 1-2 hypertension in five patients (11%), and grade 2 proteinuria in one patient (2%). INTERPRETATION: Combination aflibercept plus docetaxel can be safely administered at the dose and schedule reported here, and is associated with substantial antitumour activity. These findings suggest that further clinical development of this combination in ovarian cancer is warranted. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute, US Department of Defense, Sanofi-Aventis, Gynecologic Cancer Foundation, Marcus Foundation, and the Commonwealth Foundation.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: M Peichev; A J Naiyer; D Pereira; Z Zhu; W J Lane; M Williams; M C Oz; D J Hicklin; L Witte; M A Moore; S Rafii Journal: Blood Date: 2000-02-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: N Katsumata; R Tsunematsu; K Tanaka; Y Terashima; S Ogita; H Hoshiai; I Kohno; K Hirabayashi; M Yakushiji; K Noda; T Taguchi Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: C Kalka; H Masuda; T Takahashi; R Gordon; O Tepper; E Gravereaux; A Pieczek; H Iwaguro; S I Hayashi; J M Isner; T Asahara Journal: Circ Res Date: 2000-06-23 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Eugene S Kim; Anna Serur; Jianzhong Huang; Christina A Manley; Kimberly W McCrudden; Jason S Frischer; Samuel Z Soffer; Laurence Ring; Tamara New; Stephanie Zabski; John S Rudge; Jocelyn Holash; George D Yancopoulos; Jessica J Kandel; Darrell J Yamashiro Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-08-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jocelyn Holash; Sam Davis; Nick Papadopoulos; Susan D Croll; Lillian Ho; Michelle Russell; Patricia Boland; Ray Leidich; Donna Hylton; Elena Burova; Ella Ioffe; Tammy Huang; Czeslaw Radziejewski; Kevin Bailey; James P Fandl; Tom Daly; Stanley J Wiegand; George D Yancopoulos; John S Rudge Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-08-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Todd D Tillmanns; M Patrick Lowe; Mark S Walker; Edward J Stepanski; Lee S Schwartzberg Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Timo Rath; Kristi Baker; Jennifer A Dumont; Robert T Peters; Haiyan Jiang; Shuo-Wang Qiao; Wayne I Lencer; Glenn F Pierce; Richard S Blumberg Journal: Crit Rev Biotechnol Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 8.429
Authors: Nicole Shonka; Yuji Piao; Mark Gilbert; Alfred Yung; Susan Chang; Lisa M DeAngelis; Andrew B Lassman; Jun Liu; Timothy Cloughesy; H Ian Robins; Rita Lloyd; Alice Chen; Michael Prados; Patrick Y Wen; John Heymach; John de Groot Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Robert L Coleman; Michael W Sill; Heather A Lankes; Amanda Nickles Fader; Neil J Finkler; James S Hoffman; Peter G Rose; Gregory P Sutton; Charles W Drescher; D Scott McMeekin; Wei Hu; Michael Deavers; Andrew K Godwin; R Katherine Alpaugh; Anil K Sood Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 5.482