Literature DB >> 21992779

Gastric electrical stimulation with long pulses in humans and animals: can data obtained in animals be replicated in humans?

Geng-Qing Song1, Yong Lei, Xiaohong Xu, Jiande D Z Chen.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare effective parameters for gastric electrical stimulation (GES) to modulate gastric muscle functions in different species.
METHODS: Four species: Pigs, dogs, rats, and mice implanted with two pairs of electrodes on the serosal surface of the stomach were studied, respectively. Experiment 1 was designed to entrain/pace gastric slow waves and included a series of 5-min periods with long-pulse GES of different pulse widths and frequencies. Experiment 2 was designed to induce gastric dysrhythmia with long-pulse GES of different frequencies. Gastric slow waves were recorded during the entire experiment.
RESULTS: 1) The minimum pulse width for GES to completely entrain the slow waves was similar (100-400 msec) in all four species. 2) With fixed amplitude (4 mA) and pulse width (400 msec), the highest frequency at which slow waves could be paced was similar (about 10-60% higher than the intrinsic slow wave frequency) in all species. 3) With fixed pulse width of 400 msec and amplitude of 6 mA, GES with nine to 18 cycles per min (cpm) was able to induce dysrhythmia in dogs. In addition, there was no significant difference among these frequencies of 9-18 cpm. 4) GES with 400 msec, 6 mA, and 9 cpm was able to induce dysrhythmia in all species. These effective GES parameters in results 1-4 were similar to those used in humans in the literature.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in stimulation parameters when GES is applied to alter gastric slow waves in different animal models. Furthermore, the effective parameters for GES to alter slow waves are similar between the humans and various animal models. These findings suggest that stimulation parameters obtained from animal studies are applicable in humans.
© 2009 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21992779     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00241.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  6 in total

Review 1.  Gastrointestinal extracellular electrical recordings: fact or artifact?

Authors:  G O'Grady
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Gastric Emptying and Motility in Rats.

Authors:  Kun-Han Lu; Jiayue Cao; Steven Thomas Oleson; Terry L Powley; Zhongming Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Long-pulse gastric electrical stimulation protects interstitial cells of Cajal in diabetic rats via IGF-1 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Hai Li; Yan Chen; Shi Liu; Xiao-Hua Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Effects and mechanisms of gastrointestinal electrical stimulation on slow waves: a systematic canine study.

Authors:  Yan Sun; Geng-Qing Song; Jieyun Yin; Yong Lei; Jiande D Z Chen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Long-Pulse Gastric Electrical Stimulation Repairs Interstitial Cells of Cajal and Smooth Muscle Cells in the Gastric Antrum of Diabetic Rats.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Hongcai Wang; Hai Li; Shi Liu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Diffused and sustained inhibitory effects of intestinal electrical stimulation on intestinal motility mediated via sympathetic pathway.

Authors:  Xiaotuan Zhao; Jieyun Yin; Lijie Wang; Jiande D Z Chen
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2013-08-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.