Literature DB >> 21991875

Limberg flap is better for the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus. Results of a 767 patients series with an at least five years follow-up period.

G Osmanoglu1, F Yetisir.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pilonidal Sinus Disease (PSD) is an acquired condition usually seen in young adult males. This descriptive retrospective study has been performed to determine effects of primary suture, marsupialization and Limberg Flap for the management of PSD on the outcomes of return to work period, infection and recurrence rates.
METHODS: 823 patients were operated by same two surgeons, wide excision was done. Some patients were primarily closed (Group 1), some marsupialized (Group 2) and to a number of patients Classic Limberg (Rhomboid) Flap (Group 3) was applied. The type of the surgery was judged by the operating surgeon. In January 2010, 767 of 823 patients could be reached, and a planned telephone interview was done.
RESULTS: 767 patients (85 Female, 682 Male) with the median age of 25.8 were in the study. In "Return To Work (Days)" periods, there is statistically significant difference between groups (p < 0.001). The Return To Work Period is quite shorter in primary closure group compared with marsupialization group. In Limberg Flap Group the surgical site infection rate is the smallest with 4.7%. The highest recurrence rate is in the primary closure group. There is a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the surgery types for the recurrence rates.
CONCLUSION: Because of earlier healing, shorter return to work and lower rates of infection and recurrence, limberg flap is better for PSD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21991875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)        ISSN: 1221-9118


  5 in total

1.  [Pilonidal sinus: Secondary wound closure vs. Limberg flap : Cost and satisfaction analysis].

Authors:  P B Lebo; S Dahmann; E Sinkovits; M Meyer-Marcotty
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Pilonidal sinus disease: risk factors for postoperative complications and recurrence.

Authors:  Akin Onder; Sadullah Girgin; Murat Kapan; Mehmet Toker; Zulfu Arikanoglu; Yilmaz Palanci; Bilsel Bac
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

3.  Comparative analysis of the same technique-the same surgeon approach in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emin Kose; Mustafa Hasbahceci; Hasan Tonyali; Muslum Karagulle
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 1.859

4.  Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.

Authors:  V K Stauffer; M M Luedi; P Kauf; M Schmid; M Diekmann; K Wieferich; B Schnüriger; D Doll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Dietrich Doll; Andriu Orlik; Katharina Maier; Peter Kauf; Marco Schmid; Maja Diekmann; Andreas P Vogt; Verena K Stauffer; Markus M Luedi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.