INTRODUCTION: Tumors of the small bowel are rare and present with nonspecific symptoms. That causes a significant delay in diagnosis and consequently a worse outcome for the patient. METHODS: In a retro-prospective study we evaluated a series of 63 patients with small bowel tumors operated in the First Surgical Clinic Iaşi, during 1992-2010: 18 duodenal tumors, 26 jejunum tumors and 19 ileum tumors. There were 18 (28.6%) cases with benign tumors and 45 (71.4%) cases with malignant tumors (41 primary tumors and 4 secondary tumors). We discuss problems related to diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of these tumors in the presence of new explorations (capsule endoscopy, enteroscopy) and minimally invasive approach. RESULTS: Duodenal tumors were malignant in 14 cases (11 adenocarcinomas, 3 malignant GIST tumors) and benign in 4 cases (adenoma, lipoma, GIST tumor, schwannoma) which led to stenosis in 5 cases, upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 3 cases. Positive diagnostic was confirmed with barium meal and endoscopy. The jejunal and ileal tumors were mostly malignant 31 cases (13 carcinomas, 10 lymphomas, 2 malignant GIST and one sarcoma) with only 14 cases of benign tumors (5 GIST). Their tendency was to present as emergencies: 17 obstructions and 5 peritonitis. Modem imagistic proved useful as diagnostic tool: capsule endoscopy, CT-scan and enteroscopy. The benign tumors benefited from local resection (5 cases) and segmental enterectomy (12 cases), while malignant tumors were managed using Whiple's procedures (10 cases), duodenal-jejunal resections (1 case), segmental enterectomy (29 cases), ileocolectomy (2 cases) and three bypasses. Laparoscopic approach was performed in 8 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of small bowel tumors remains low. For diagnosis, CT-scan, enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy are very useful; unfortunately the last method is not practicable in emergency. Surgery is the best choice plus chemotherapy for some malignant tumors. Laparoscopic approach is feasible in selected cases.
INTRODUCTION:Tumors of the small bowel are rare and present with nonspecific symptoms. That causes a significant delay in diagnosis and consequently a worse outcome for the patient. METHODS: In a retro-prospective study we evaluated a series of 63 patients with small bowel tumors operated in the First Surgical Clinic Iaşi, during 1992-2010: 18 duodenal tumors, 26 jejunum tumors and 19 ileum tumors. There were 18 (28.6%) cases with benign tumors and 45 (71.4%) cases with malignant tumors (41 primary tumors and 4 secondary tumors). We discuss problems related to diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of these tumors in the presence of new explorations (capsule endoscopy, enteroscopy) and minimally invasive approach. RESULTS:Duodenal tumors were malignant in 14 cases (11 adenocarcinomas, 3 malignant GIST tumors) and benign in 4 cases (adenoma, lipoma, GIST tumor, schwannoma) which led to stenosis in 5 cases, upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 3 cases. Positive diagnostic was confirmed with barium meal and endoscopy. The jejunal and ileal tumors were mostly malignant 31 cases (13 carcinomas, 10 lymphomas, 2 malignant GIST and one sarcoma) with only 14 cases of benign tumors (5 GIST). Their tendency was to present as emergencies: 17 obstructions and 5 peritonitis. Modem imagistic proved useful as diagnostic tool: capsule endoscopy, CT-scan and enteroscopy. The benign tumors benefited from local resection (5 cases) and segmental enterectomy (12 cases), while malignant tumors were managed using Whiple's procedures (10 cases), duodenal-jejunal resections (1 case), segmental enterectomy (29 cases), ileocolectomy (2 cases) and three bypasses. Laparoscopic approach was performed in 8 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of small bowel tumors remains low. For diagnosis, CT-scan, enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy are very useful; unfortunately the last method is not practicable in emergency. Surgery is the best choice plus chemotherapy for some malignant tumors. Laparoscopic approach is feasible in selected cases.