Literature DB >> 21990592

Timing of aneurysm surgery: the International Cooperative Study revisited in the era of endovascular coiling.

Matthew F Lawson1, Yueh-Yun Chi, Gregory J Velat, J D Mocco, Brian L Hoh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery demonstrated that subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients who underwent surgery on post-hemorrhage days 4-10 had worse outcomes than patients treated on days 0-3 and days 11-14. Based on these findings, it was concluded that patients who present with SAH on days 4-10 should have aneurysm surgery delayed until after day 10. Since the study, coiling has become a treatment option and it is unclear whether these results apply to this new treatment modality. Our institution is a regional referral center for SAH, and patients are transferred at different time points after hemorrhage. We wanted to determine whether patients that arrive on days 4-10 were safe to undergo coiling immediately rather than waiting until after day 10.
METHODS: We reviewed 119 consecutive SAH patients who underwent coiling between January 2006 and June 2008. Factors of age, gender, Hunt-Hess grade, Fisher score, aneurysm size and aneurysm location were included in a regression analysis to determine the effect of day of coiling on clinical outcome at discharge.
RESULTS: Of 119 study patients, 86% had coiling on post-hemorrhage days 0-3, and 12% on days 4-10. Patients in these cohorts did not differ in any demographic factors. Age and Hunt-Hess grade were the only predictors of mortality (age p=0.0001, Hunt-Hess p=0.0110) and poor outcome, defined as death or discharge to a skilled nursing facility (age p=0.0001, Hunt-Hess p=0.0001). Day of coiling had no effect on mortality (p=0.5731) or poor outcome (p=0.1861).
CONCLUSIONS: Coiling of ruptured aneurysms can be performed safely on patients who arrive on post-hemorrhage days 4-10, and treatment need not be delayed after day 10, as the results of the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery Study initially suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21990592     DOI: 10.1136/jnis.2009.001172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  6 in total

Review 1.  Early endovascular treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jordi A Matias-Guiu; Carmen Serna-Candel
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2013-03

2.  Outcomes following acute poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid bleed - Is early definitive treatment better than delayed management?

Authors:  Adam Gittins; Nick Talbott; Ahmed A Gilani; Greg Packer; Richard Browne; Randeep Mullhi; Zaheed Khan; T Whitehouse; Antonio Belli; Rajnikant L Mehta; Fang Gao-Smith; Tonny Veenith
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2020-09-03

3.  Timing of operation for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Qiao Zhang; Lu Ma; Yi Liu; Min He; Hong Sun; Xiang Wang; Yuan Fang; Xu-hui Hui; Chao You
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.474

4.  Kinematic measures provide useful information after intracranial aneurysm treatment.

Authors:  Rachael K Raw; Richard M Wilkie; Mark Mon-Williams; Stuart A Ross; Kenan Deniz; Tony Goddard; Tufail Patankar
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2017-12-04

5.  CircRNA_0079586 and circRNA_RanGAP1 are involved in the pathogenesis of intracranial aneurysms rupture by regulating the expression of MPO.

Authors:  Zhuang Zhang; Rubo Sui; Lili Ge; Dongjian Xia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Hyperacute versus Subacute Coiling of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage a Short-term Outcome and Single-Center Experience, Pilot Study.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Mostafa Ibrahim Ali; Ghada Abdel Hady Ossman Ashmawy; Ayman Youssef Ezeddin Eassa; Osama Yassin Mansour
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.