BACKGROUND: Neuroblastomas (NBs) are characterized by clinical heterogeneity, from spontaneous regression to relentless progression. The pattern of NTRK family gene expression contributes to these disparate behaviors. TrkA/NTRK1 is expressed in favorable NBs that regress or differentiate, whereas TrkB/NTRK2 and its ligand brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are co-expressed in unfavorable NBs, representing an autocrine survival pathway. We determined the significance of NTRK family gene expression in a large, representative set of primary NBs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the expression of the following genes in 814 NBs using quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR): NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3, P75/NGFR, nerve growth factor (NGF), BDNF, IGFR1, and EGFR. Expression (high vs. low) was dichotomized by median expression value and compared to clinical and biological variables as well as outcome. RESULTS: High NTRK1 expression was strongly correlated with favorable age, stage, MYCN status, histology, ploidy, risk group, and outcome (P < 0.0001 for all). However, it did not add significantly to the panel of prognostic variables currently used for cooperative group trials. NTRK2 expression was associated with risk factors but not with outcome. High NGF expression was also associated with most risk factors and weakly with unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: High expression of NTRK1 is strongly associated with favorable risk factors and outcome in a large, representative population of NB patients. It did not add significantly to the current risk prediction algorithm, but it may contribute to future expression classifiers. Indeed, prospective assessment of NTRK1 and NTRK2 expression will identify tumors that would be candidates for NTRK-targeted therapy, either alone or in combination with conventional agents.
BACKGROUND:Neuroblastomas (NBs) are characterized by clinical heterogeneity, from spontaneous regression to relentless progression. The pattern of NTRK family gene expression contributes to these disparate behaviors. TrkA/NTRK1 is expressed in favorable NBs that regress or differentiate, whereas TrkB/NTRK2 and its ligand brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are co-expressed in unfavorable NBs, representing an autocrine survival pathway. We determined the significance of NTRK family gene expression in a large, representative set of primary NBs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the expression of the following genes in 814 NBs using quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR): NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3, P75/NGFR, nerve growth factor (NGF), BDNF, IGFR1, and EGFR. Expression (high vs. low) was dichotomized by median expression value and compared to clinical and biological variables as well as outcome. RESULTS: High NTRK1 expression was strongly correlated with favorable age, stage, MYCN status, histology, ploidy, risk group, and outcome (P < 0.0001 for all). However, it did not add significantly to the panel of prognostic variables currently used for cooperative group trials. NTRK2 expression was associated with risk factors but not with outcome. High NGF expression was also associated with most risk factors and weakly with unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: High expression of NTRK1 is strongly associated with favorable risk factors and outcome in a large, representative population of NB patients. It did not add significantly to the current risk prediction algorithm, but it may contribute to future expression classifiers. Indeed, prospective assessment of NTRK1 and NTRK2 expression will identify tumors that would be candidates for NTRK-targeted therapy, either alone or in combination with conventional agents.
Authors: M B Meyers; W P Shen; B A Spengler; V Ciccarone; J P O'Brien; D B Donner; M E Furth; J L Biedler Journal: J Cell Biochem Date: 1988-10 Impact factor: 4.429
Authors: A T Look; F A Hayes; J J Shuster; E C Douglass; R P Castleberry; L C Bowman; E I Smith; G M Brodeur Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1991-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hiroyuki Shimada; Atsuko Nakagawa; Julius Peters; Hong Wang; Peter K Wakamatsu; John N Lukens; Katherine K Matthay; Stuart E Siegel; Robert C Seeger Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: H Shimada; J Chatten; W A Newton; N Sachs; A B Hamoudi; T Chiba; H B Marsden; K Misugi Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1984-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Juan Palacios-Moreno; Lauren Foltz; Ailan Guo; Matthew P Stokes; Emily D Kuehn; Lynn George; Michael Comb; Mark L Grimes Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: V Veschi; M Petroni; A Bartolazzi; P Altavista; C Dominici; C Capalbo; R Boldrini; A Castellano; H P McDowell; B Pizer; L Frati; I Screpanti; A Gulino; G Giannini Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Valeria Solari; Lucia Borriello; Gianluca Turcatel; Hiroyuki Shimada; Richard Sposto; G Esteban Fernandez; Shahab Asgharzadeh; Edwin A Yates; Jeremy E Turnbull; Yves A DeClerck Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 12.701