BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced soft tissue sarcomas (RI-STS) are rare, and it is believed that they are associated with a poor prognosis.The authors of this report compared the clinical and functional outcomes of adults who had extremity RI-STS with the outcomes of adults with sporadic STS. METHODS: Forty-four patients who were diagnosed with RI-STS from 1989 to 2009 were identified from 4 prospectively collected databases. Patient demographics, surgical and adjuvant treatment parameters, and oncologic and functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The median latent period from irradiation of the primary condition to RI-STS diagnosis was 16 years. The median radiotherapy dose used for the index condition was 45 gray. The median age at RI-STS diagnosis was 56 years. The most common primary diagnoses were breast cancer (36.4%) and lymphoma (34.1%). The most common RI-STS histologies were malignant fibrous histiocytoma (36.4%) and angiosarcoma (18.2%). Forty-two patients underwent surgery, 13 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, and 8 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Systemic metastases occurred in 50% of treated patients (n = 21), and 26% (n = 11) developed local recurrence, the risk of which was lower among patients who received reirradiation (P = .043). The 5-year disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS) rates for patients with RI-STS who presented without metastasis were 36% and 44%, respectively. Patients who had International Union Against Cancer TNM stage III RI-STS had a significantly worse DFI compared with patients who had stage III sporadic STS (multivariate analysis, P = .051). Eighteen patients with RI-STS underwent functional assessment after surgery, and their results were comparable to those of patients with sporadic STS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite aggressive surgical treatment, patients who have RI-STS remain at greater risk of both local and systemic recurrence compared with patients who have sporadic STS, but they can anticipate similar functional outcomes. Reirradiation can be relatively safe and effective if used properly.
BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced soft tissue sarcomas (RI-STS) are rare, and it is believed that they are associated with a poor prognosis.The authors of this report compared the clinical and functional outcomes of adults who had extremity RI-STS with the outcomes of adults with sporadic STS. METHODS: Forty-four patients who were diagnosed with RI-STS from 1989 to 2009 were identified from 4 prospectively collected databases. Patient demographics, surgical and adjuvant treatment parameters, and oncologic and functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The median latent period from irradiation of the primary condition to RI-STS diagnosis was 16 years. The median radiotherapy dose used for the index condition was 45 gray. The median age at RI-STS diagnosis was 56 years. The most common primary diagnoses were breast cancer (36.4%) and lymphoma (34.1%). The most common RI-STS histologies were malignant fibrous histiocytoma (36.4%) and angiosarcoma (18.2%). Forty-two patients underwent surgery, 13 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, and 8 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Systemic metastases occurred in 50% of treated patients (n = 21), and 26% (n = 11) developed local recurrence, the risk of which was lower among patients who received reirradiation (P = .043). The 5-year disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS) rates for patients with RI-STS who presented without metastasis were 36% and 44%, respectively. Patients who had International Union Against Cancer TNM stage III RI-STS had a significantly worse DFI compared with patients who had stage III sporadic STS (multivariate analysis, P = .051). Eighteen patients with RI-STS underwent functional assessment after surgery, and their results were comparable to those of patients with sporadic STS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite aggressive surgical treatment, patients who have RI-STS remain at greater risk of both local and systemic recurrence compared with patients who have sporadic STS, but they can anticipate similar functional outcomes. Reirradiation can be relatively safe and effective if used properly.
Authors: Jennifer LaFemina; Li-Xuan Qin; Nicole H Moraco; Cristina R Antonescu; Ryan C Fields; Aimee M Crago; Murray F Brennan; Samuel Singer Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Sean P Dineen; Christina L Roland; Rachel Feig; Caitlin May; Shouhao Zhou; Elizabeth Demicco; Ghadah Al Sannaa; Davis Ingram; Wei-Lein Wang; Vinod Ravi; Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Dina Lev; Raphael E Pollock; Kelly Hunt; Janice Cormier; Alex Lazar; Barry Feig; Keila E Torres Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Alexander L Lazarides; Zachary D C Burke; Manit K Gundavda; Rostislav Novak; Michelle Ghert; David A Wilson; Peter S Rose; Philip Wong; Anthony M Griffin; Peter C Ferguson; Jay S Wunder; Matthew T Houdek; Kim M Tsoi Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Keila E Torres; Vinod Ravi; Katherine Kin; Min Yi; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Caitlin D May; Banu K Arun; Kelly K Hunt; Ryan Lam; Guy Lahat; Aviad Hoffman; Janice N Cormier; Barry W Feig; Alexander J Lazar; Dina Lev; Raphael E Pollock Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 5.344