Literature DB >> 21989574

Computerized segmentation method for individual calcifications within clustered microcalcifications while maintaining their shapes on magnification mammograms.

Akiyoshi Hizukuri1, Ryohei Nakayama, Nobuo Nakako, Hiroharu Kawanaka, Haruhiko Takase, Koji Yamamoto, Shinji Tsuruoka.   

Abstract

In a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) scheme for evaluating the likelihood of malignancy of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms, it is necessary to segment individual calcifications correctly. The purpose of this study was to develop a computerized segmentation method for individual calcifications with various sizes while maintaining their shapes in the CADx schemes. Our database consisted of 96 magnification mammograms with 96 clustered microcalcifications. In our proposed method, a mammogram image was decomposed into horizontal subimages, vertical subimages, and diagonal subimages for a second difference at scales 1 to 4 by using a filter bank. The enhanced subimages for nodular components (NCs) and the enhanced subimages for both nodular and linear components (NLCs) were obtained from analysis of a Hessian matrix composed of the pixel values in those subimages for the second difference at each scale. At each pixel, eight objective features were given by pixel values in the subimages for NCs at scales 1 to 4 and the subimages for NLCs at scales 1 to 4. An artificial neural network with the eight objective features was employed to enhance calcifications on magnification mammograms. Calcifications were finally segmented by applying a gray-level thresholding technique to the enhanced image for calcifications. With the proposed method, a sensitivity of calcifications within clustered microcalcifications and the number of false positives per image were 96.5% (603/625) and 1.69, respectively. The average shape accuracy for segmented calcifications was also 91.4%. The proposed method with high sensitivity of calcifications while maintaining their shapes would be useful in the CADx schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21989574      PMCID: PMC3348978          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9420-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  18 in total

1.  The positive predictive value of mammography.

Authors:  D B Kopans
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for identifying histological classification of clustered microcalcifications by use of follow-up magnification mammograms.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Ryoji Watanabe; Kiyoshi Namba; Kan Takeda; Koji Yamamoto; Shigehiko Katsuragawa; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings.

Authors:  Chisako Muramatsu; Qiang Li; Robert A Schmidt; Junji Shiraishi; Kenji Suzuki; Gillian M Newstead; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Computer-aided diagnosis scheme using a filter bank for detection of microcalcification clusters in mammograms.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Yoshikazu Uchiyama; Koji Yamamoto; Ryoji Watanabe; Kiyoshi Namba
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow.

Authors:  C Xu; J L Prince
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  Investigation of psychophysical similarity measures for selection of similar images in the diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms.

Authors:  Chisako Muramatsu; Qiang Li; Robert Schmidt; Junji Shiraishi; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.

Authors:  H P Chan; B Sahiner; K L Lam; N Petrick; M A Helvie; M M Goodsitt; D D Adler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network.

Authors:  H P Chan; B Sahiner; N Petrick; M A Helvie; K L Lam; D D Adler; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on magnification mammograms.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Yoshikazu Uchiyama; Ryoji Watanabe; Shigehiko Katsuragawa; Kiyoshi Namba; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Methods on Skull Stripping of MRI Head Scan Images-a Review.

Authors:  P Kalavathi; V B Surya Prasath
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A Micro CT Study in Patients with Breast Microcalcifications Using a Mathematical Algorithm to Assess 3D Structure.

Authors:  David Kenkel; Zsuzsanna Varga; Heike Heuer; Konstantin J Dedes; Nicole Berger; Lukas Filli; Andreas Boss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Breast Cancer Segmentation Methods: Current Status and Future Potentials.

Authors:  Epimack Michael; He Ma; Hong Li; Frank Kulwa; Jing Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.