Literature DB >> 21989439

Feasibility of helical tomotherapy for radical dose retreatment in pelvic area: a report of 4 cases.

Francesco Ricchetti1, Salvina Barra, Stefano Agostinelli, Stefano Vagge, Michela Marcenaro, Renzo Corvò.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
BACKGROUND: To retrospectively determine acute toxicity and local control in patients with recurrence after definitive radiotherapy for prostate, bladder and rectal carcinoma.
METHODS: Between September 2009 and March 2010, 4 patients with a prior history of pelvic radiotherapy were treated with helical tomotherapy. The prior course of radiotherapy was given for prostate cancer in 2 patients, bladder carcinoma in 1 patient and rectal carcinoma in 1 patient. The median prescribed dose of the prior course of radiotherapy was 6320 cGy (range, 5000-7600), and the median elapsed time between the first and second course was 17 months (range, 4-73). The total prescribed dose for tomotherapy retreatment was 60 Gy in 3 patients and 50 Gy in 1 patient. Hormone therapy was administered to 2 patients before and during radiation. No patient underwent surgical resection.
RESULTS: The cumulative mean dose to the rectum ranged from 3813 to 6058 cGy; cumulative rectal maximum dose to 1 cc ranged from 6475 to 8780 cGy. Regarding the bladder, the cumulative mean dose was between 4384 and 7612 cGy; cumulative maximum dose to 1 cc ranged from 7560 to 9790 cGy. All patients completed the re-irradiation course. Acute genitourinary toxicity (RTOG scale) was grade 0 in 3 patients and grade 1 in 1 patient; acute gastrointestinal toxicity was grade 0 in 3 patients and grade 1 in 1 patient. With a median follow-up of 9 months (range, 7-12), late toxicity was G0 in all patients. Three patients showed partial response with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, and 1 had a PSA decrease.
CONCLUSIONS: Re-irradiation with helical tomotherapy was well tolerated, with low rates of acute and late toxicity. It can be therefore considered a useful tool to improve local control in patients previously treated with radiotherapy. However, a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up are required to assess retreatment safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21989439     DOI: 10.1177/030089161109700413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  2 in total

Review 1.  Retreatment for prostate cancer with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): Feasible or foolhardy?

Authors:  Stefano Arcangeli; Linda Agolli; Vittorio Donato
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-09-10

2.  Stereotactic radiotherapy for isolated nodal recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  B Detti; P Bonomo; L Masi; R Doro; S Cipressi; C Iermano; I Bonucci; D Franceschini; L Di Brina; M Bakhi; G Simontacchi; I Meattini; L Livi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.