Literature DB >> 21989420

Effect of alteration in pump speed on pump output and left ventricular filling with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Christopher S Hayward1, Robert Salamonsen, Anne M Keogh, John Woodard, Peter Ayre, Roslyn Prichard, Robyn Walker, Eugene Kotlyar, Peter S Macdonald, Paul Jansz, Phillip Spratt.   

Abstract

Third-generation continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) provide reduced pulsatility flow. We examined the safe working range for LVAD pump speed and the effect on pump output and cardiac function in 13 stable outpatients with VentrAssist-LVAD (Ventracor Ltd, Australia). Pump speed was decreased from a baseline mean of 2,073 ± 86 revolutions per minute (RPM, with corresponding mean flow of 5.59 ± 1.18 L/min, mean ± standard deviation) to an average low-speed of 1,835 ± 55 RPM (corresponding flow 4.68 ± 0.99 L/min) and up to high-speed of 2,315 ± 66 RPM (corresponding flow 6.30 ± 1.29 L/min). There was a strong linear relationship between alteration in speed and flow rates (r(2) = 0.89, p < 0.00001) but marked interpatient variation. Downward titration to preset minimum 1,800 RPM was achieved in 9/13 (69%) and upward titration to the preset maximum 2,400 RPM was achieved in 4/13 (31%). Upward titration was stopped due to ventricular suction or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 4/13 (31%). Ventricular suction or VT (in 4/13) tended to be more common in patients with poor right ventricular (RV) function (p = 0.07). In summary, pump flow is stable within a relatively small speed range and should not be altered without close monitoring due to variation in response between patients, particularly with concomitant RV impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21989420     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318233b112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  6 in total

1.  Computational fluid dynamics-based study of possibility of generating pulsatile blood flow via a continuous-flow VAD.

Authors:  Erfan Nammakie; Hanieh Niroomand-Oscuii; Mojtaba Koochaki; Farzan Ghalichi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A Sensorless Modular Multiobjective Control Algorithm for Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Clinical Pilot Study.

Authors:  Martin Maw; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Christiane Marko; Philipp Aigner; Christoph Gross; Gregor Widhalm; Anne-Kristin Schaefer; Michael Schima; Franziska Wittmann; Dominik Wiedemann; Francesco Moscato; D'Anne Kudlik; Robert Stadler; Daniel Zimpfer; Heinrich Schima
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 3.  Assessment of right ventricular function in left ventricular assist device candidates.

Authors:  Salim Hayek; Daniel B Sims; David W Markham; Javed Butler; Andreas P Kalogeropoulos
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Hemodynamic effects of various support modes of continuous flow LVADs on the cardiovascular system: a numerical study.

Authors:  Zhiming Song; Kaiyun Gu; Bin Gao; Feng Wan; Yu Chang; Yi Zeng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-05-05

5.  Factors influencing the functional status of aortic valve in ovine models supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Xin-Yi Yu; Jian-Wei Shi; Yi-Rui Zang; Jie-Min Zhang; Zhi-Gang Liu
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.663

6.  Control Strategy Design of a Microblood Pump Based on Heart-Rate Feedback.

Authors:  Teng Jing; Tianye Xin; Fangqun Wang; Zhihao Zhang; Ling Zhou
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.891

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.