Literature DB >> 21989338

The dilated distal esophagus: a new entity that is the pathologic basis of early gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Parakrama Chandrasoma1, Sulochana Wijetunge, Yanling Ma, Steven Demeester, Jeffrey Hagen, Tom Demeester.   

Abstract

Present management algorithms for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) limit endoscopy to patients with advanced disease. When endoscopy is performed, biopsy is limited to patients who have a visible columnar-lined esophagus. Biopsy is not recommended for patients whose endoscopy is normal. This algorithm results in the failure to evaluate patients with early stages of GERD at a pathologic level. We report 714 patients with normal endoscopic findings irrespective of symptoms who had adequate biopsies taken from the squamocolumnar junction and the area 1-cm distal to this from mucosa that had rugal folds. Concurrent biopsies were also taken from the gastric body and/or antrum. All patients had a gap between their esophageal squamous epithelium and gastric oxyntic mucosa in the junctional region composed of oxyntocardiac ± cardiac ± intestinal epithelia. A total of 643 (90.1%) patients had no significant pathology in the gastric antrum and/or body, indicating that the squamooxyntic gap was an isolated abnormality in this region in all but 71 (9.9%) patients. The gap contained only oxyntocardiac epithelium in 71 (9.9%) patients, cardiac mucosa without intestinal metaplasia in 482 (67.5%) patients, and intestinal metaplasia in 161 (22.6%) patients. The pathologic interpretation of biopsies taken from the gastroesophageal junction is confusing and has significant interobserver variation. This results from lack of agreement as to whether these biopsies originate in the proximal stomach ("gastric cardia") or in the esophagus. We provide evidence that the presence of oxyntocardiac ± cardiac ± intestinal epithelia in biopsies from patients who are endoscopically normal is diagnostic of a dilated GERD-damaged distal esophagus. The dilated distal esophagus is the pathologic manifestation of destruction of the abdominal segment of the lower esophageal sphincter. Its presence is the pathologic basis of early GERD, which is missed if patients who are endoscopically normal are not biopsied, as is the present recommendation. Its recognition allows for accurate and evidence-based interpretation of biopsies from this region and removes the present confusion and permits the development of a reproducible pathologic diagnostic method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21989338     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31822b78e8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  7 in total

1.  Radial esophageal acid exposure and the dilated distal esophagus.

Authors:  Sebastian F Schoppmann; Martin F Riegler
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Kyoto international consensus report on anatomy, pathophysiology and clinical significance of the gastro-oesophageal junction.

Authors:  Kentaro Sugano; Stuart Jon Spechler; Emad M El-Omar; Kenneth E L McColl; Kaiyo Takubo; Takuji Gotoda; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Katsunori Iijima; Haruhiro Inoue; Takashi Kawai; Yoshikazu Kinoshita; Hiroto Miwa; Ken-Ichi Mukaisho; Kazunari Murakami; Yasuyuki Seto; Hisao Tajiri; Shobna Bhatia; Myung-Gyu Choi; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Kwong Ming Fock; Khean-Lee Goh; Khek Yu Ho; Varocha Mahachai; Maria O'Donovan; Robert Odze; Richard Peek; Massimo Rugge; Prateek Sharma; Jose D Sollano; Michael Vieth; Justin Wu; Ming-Shiang Wu; Duowu Zou; Michio Kaminishi; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 31.793

Review 3.  Review on novel concepts of columnar lined esophagus.

Authors:  Johannes Lenglinger; Stephanie Fischer See; Lukas Beller; Enrico P Cosentini; Reza Asari; Fritz Wrba; Martin Riegler; Sebastian F Schoppmann
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Multilayered epithelium at the gastroesophageal junction is a marker of gastroesophageal reflux disease: data from a prospective Central European multicenter study (histoGERD trial).

Authors:  Cord Langner; Eva-Maria Wolf; Wolfgang Plieschnegger; Michael Geppert; Bernd Wigginghaus; Gabriele M Höss; Andreas Eherer; Nora I Schneider; Peter Rehak; Michael Vieth
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  A Summary of the 2016 James W. Freston Conference of the American Gastroenterological Association: Intestinal Metaplasia in the Esophagus and Stomach: Origins, Differences, Similarities and Significance.

Authors:  Stuart J Spechler; Juanita L Merchant; Timothy C Wang; Parakrama Chandrasoma; James G Fox; Robert M Genta; James R Goldenring; Yoku Hayakawa; Ernst J Kuipers; Pauline K Lund; Frank McKeon; Jason C Mills; Robert D Odze; Richard M Peek; Thai Pham; Jianwen Que; Anil K Rustgi; Nicholas J Shaheen; Ramesh A Shivdasani; Rhonda F Souza; Peter Storz; Andrea Todisco; David H Wang; Nicholas A Wright
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 33.883

Review 6.  The Barrett's Gland in Phenotype Space.

Authors:  Stuart A C McDonald; Trevor A Graham; Danielle L Lavery; Nicholas A Wright; Marnix Jansen
Journal:  Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-12

Review 7.  Proposed approach to the challenging management of progressive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Joachim Labenz; Parakrama T Chandrasoma; Laura J Knapp; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-09-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.