Literature DB >> 21989216

Discontinuation of proton pump inhibitors during assessment of chromogranin A levels in patients with neuroendocrine tumours.

C M Korse1, M Muller, B G Taal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to examine whether discontinuation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or replacement by H(2)-receptor antagonists (H2RA) resulted in a decrease of chromogranin A (CgA) levels in 196 patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs).
METHODS: Patients with an unexpectedly high CgA level not connected with NET disease discontinued PPIs, or used H2RA instead; 2 weeks later CgA level was measured again.
RESULTS: In all, 19 out of 196 (10%) patients showed unexpected elevated CgA levels, they all used PPI. In 11 out of 19 patients with no evidence of the disease, median CgA decreased from 390 μg l(-1) during PPI treatment to 56 μg l(-1) after discontinuation (P=0.003). In 8 out of 19 patients with stable disease, median CgA decreased from 618 to 318 μg l(-1) (P=0.012). In 12 out of 19 patients who ceased all acid inhibition, CgA levels decreased by 82%, while in the seven patients who replaced PPI by H2RA, CgA decreased by 77% (P=0.967).
CONCLUSION: Proton pump inhibitor use causes falsely elevated CgA levels in patients with NET. We recommend to stop, or replace PPI by H2RA, to obtain a reliable CgA value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21989216      PMCID: PMC3208502          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are rare, slow-growing tumours. Chromogranin A (CgA) has replaced the 24-h urine collection of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid and has become the most important tumour marker in the monitoring of NET during and after treatment and is recommended by the European NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society (Korse ; O'Toole ). Chromogranin A is localised in the secretory granules of the neuroendocrine cells. Chromogranin A levels may also be elevated in other disease processes, such as prostate cancer, liver failure, cardiovascular diseases and renal failure (Tramonti ; Modlin ; Vezzosi ). However, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is the most important reason for an elevated CgA level, not caused by NET (Modlin ). Thus far, the effect of discontinuation of PPI therapy was not investigated. This study examines whether discontinuation of PPI treatment, or replacement by H2-receptor antagonist (H2RA) therapy, decreases or even normalises the unexplained elevation of CgA levels in patients with well-differentiated NET.

Materials and methods

For this prospective study, all patients diagnosed with well-differentiated NET visiting the Netherlands Cancer Institute between 2007 and 2009 with at least two available CgA measurements, were examined. Clinical data and medication were retrieved from medical records. Stage of disease was based on CT scans, or somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Chromogranin A was determined with the CGA-RIA, a solid-phase, two-site immunoradiometric (CIS bio International, Gif-sur-Yvette, France) (Degorce ; Korse ). The reference value in our laboratory was established as <120 μg l−1. All patients with a normal CgA level during the study period were excluded from further examination. Patients with elevated CgA levels showing metastases or tumour progression were also excluded from further observation; these elevated CgA levels were attributed to tumour activity only. If patients showed elevated or increasing CgA levels that could not be attributed to the status of NET, the gastric acid inhibition treatment was registered. Those patients with unexpected elevated CgA levels and using PPI were asked to (temporarily) discontinue the PPI or to (temporarily) replace the PPI by H2RA treatment. After 2 weeks, the CgA level was measured again. Wilcoxon paired tests and Mann–Whitney tests were applied to compare the CgA levels just before and 14 days after PPI discontinuation, and to compare change in CgA levels between patients who discontinued any acid suppressing therapy and patients who replaced PPI by H2RA. A change of >40% was considered as a significant change in the comparison of serial measurements (Dittadi ).

Results

Table 1 presents the characteristics of 196 patients at the time of the first CgA measurement: a total of 55 patients showed normal CgA levels and 122 patients had at least one elevated CgA level that was attributed to the status of the disease, according to imaging; these patients were not monitored longer for this study.
Table 1

Characteristics of the total study population

  N=196
Sex  
 Male88 (45%)
 Female108 (55%)
  
Age (years)  
 Median (range)64 (18–89)
  
Primary tumour site  
 Appendix5 (3%)
 Small bowel86 (44%)
 Large bowel22 (11%)
 Lung21 (10%)
 Pancreas17 (9%)
 Other4 (2%)
 Unknown41 (21%)
  
Metastases  
 No57 (29%)
 Yes139 (71%)
  
Carcinoid syndrome  
 No66 (34%)
 Yes130 (66%)
  
GFR  
 Normal171 (87%)
 Decreased25 (13%)
  
Number of CgA measurements  
 Median (range)6 (2–27)
  
CgA level  
 Normal55 (28%)
 Elevated (attributed to NET)122 (62%)
 Elevated (not attributed to NET)19 (10%)
  
PPI use  
 No145 (74%)
 Yes51 (26%)

Abbreviations: CgA=chromogranin A; GFR=glomerular filtration rate; NET=neuroendocrine tumour; PPI=proton pump inhibitor.

The remaining 19 patients had elevated CgA levels that could not be attributed to the disease status: 11 patients with no evidence of disease (NED) after surgery and eight patients with stable metastatic disease (SD) (Table 2). All these patients used PPI (omeprazole 20–40 mg daily) for dyspepsia or pyrosis, mainly prescribed by their general practitioner. In case of severe pyrosis, PPI was replaced by H2RA (ranitidine 300 mg daily, n=7). The remaining patients discontinued the acid inhibition completely (n=12). All 19 patients experienced no discomfort from this temporary cease of PPI use.
Table 2

Change in CgA levels in 19 patients after discontinuation of PPIs treatment

Patient Sex, age (years) Grade Primary site Status of disease Carcinoid syndrome GFR (ml per minute per 1.73 m2) Replacement CgA (μg l–1) during PPI CgA (μg l–1) after PPI CgA change (%)
1F, 63G1AppendixNEDNA85H2RA425120−72
2F, 51G2LungNEDNA86H2RA30742−86
3F, 54G2LungNEDNA76Stop17851−71
4F, 42G1LungNEDNA72Stop12315−88
5M, 65G1Small bowelNEDNA95Stop26640−85
6F, 77G1Small bowelNEDNA93Stop1310245−81
7F, 61G1Small bowelNEDNA50Stop1610181−89
8F, 65G1Small bowelNEDNA77H2RA20648−77
9M, 76G1Small bowelNEDNA90H2RA39065−83
10F, 67G1PancreasNEDNA102Stop40456−86
11M, 75G1Small bowelNEDNA59Stop576101−82
12M, 68G1PancreasSDYes82H2RA1367332−76
13F, 67G1Small bowelSDYes78H2RA588148−75
14F, 50G1PancreasSDNo78Stop1330305−77
15F, 66G1Small bowelSDNo60Stop646436−33
16F, 56G1UnknownSDYes72H2RA23538−84
17F, 60G1UnknownSDYes67Stop872421−52
18M, 78G1Small bowelSDYes36Stop589380−35
19M, 67G1Small bowelSDNo124Stop58795−84

Abbreviations: CgA=chromogranin A; F=female; GFR=glomerular filtration rate; H2RA=H2-receptor antagonist; M=male; NA=not applicable; NED=no evidence of disease; PPI=proton pump inhibitor; SD=stable disease.

In the 11 patients with NED, the median CgA level decreased from 390 μg l–1 during PPI treatment to 56 μg l–1 after discontinuation of PPI (P=0.003). At that time, nine patients showed normal CgA levels, while in two patients (patients 6 and 7), the CgA levels decreased by 81% and 89%, respectively. The eight patients with SD according to imaging, showed unexpected increase of CgA levels. After discontinuation of PPI, the median CgA level decreased from 618 μg l–1 during PPI use to 318 μg l–1 (P=0.012). In two patients (patients 16 and 19), CgA levels even normalised. All patients except two (patients 15 and 18) reached the critical difference of CgA change of >40% (33% and 35%, respectively). In 12 of the 19 patients with unexpected positive CgA levels who stopped all acid inhibition completely, CgA levels decreased by (median) 82% (range 33–89%). A similar trend was found in the seven patients who replaced PPI by H2RA: their CgA levels decreased by 77% (range 72–86%) (P=0.967).

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the association of CgA levels and use of PPIs in patients treated for NET. High CgA levels were observed in 19 of the 196 (10%) patients, which could not be explained by tumour recurrence or progressive disease. All these patients were PPI users. An association between CgA levels and the use of PPI has already been described: a Dutch group published a cross-sectional study of 114 dyspeptic patients and showed that CgA levels were higher during long-term PPI treatment than during H2RA treatment, or no treatment (Sanduleanu ). Giusti observed in six of seven patients a significant decrease of CgA levels after discontinuation of omeprazole. These studies suggested that decrease in acidity leads to release of gastrin. Elevated gastrin leads to hyperplasia of ECL cells and, subsequently, to an increase in CgA levels (Waldum ; Sanduleanu ). However, longitudinal studies investigating the effect of PPIs on CgA levels in patients with NET are lacking. In our group of NET patients, the elevated CgA levels significantly decreased, or even returned to normal, after discontinuation of gastric acid inhibition completely. A similar decrease was observed after replacement of PPI by H2RA. A discontinuation of PPI of 2 weeks seemed a reasonable period in which to expect a decrease, similar to the report of Giusti et al. However, two patients (patients 6 and 7) with CgA levels >10 times the upper limit of normal showed an 81–89% decrease, but did not reach the normal range. Possibly, in patients with such extreme high values, a longer discontinuation is needed. It has also been suggested that cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) might have a role in the metabolising of PPI. Even a five-fold higher exposure to PPIs has been observed in poor metabolisers (PMs) than in extensive metabolisers of CYP2C19 (Desta ; Giusti ). As the prevalence of PMs in Caucasian people is 1–3%, in some cases, the CgA could still be false positive after 2 weeks of discontinuation. The two patients (patients 15 and 18) achieved a decrease <40%. Their CgA levels returned back to the precious levels (data not shown). Apparently, the CgA results were explained by both NET disease and PPI use. Since both the biological and assay variation of CgA, NET disease and PPI use might affect the CgA concentration, it is of crucial importance to stop PPI, to exclude the PPI influence on CgA levels. Patient 18 with liver metastases suffered also from renal failure (glomerular filtration rate=36 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), but even then the CgA level decreased with 35% (Modlin ). Of the 122 patients, 24 (20%) with high CgA levels used PPI. Examination of the medical reports showed that the concentration of CgA levels was fully attributed to the disease. In the group of 55 patients with normal CgA levels, 5 (9%) were PPI users. The duration of PPI use of these patients was unknown, but Sanduleanu suggested that the longer the use of PPI, the higher the CgA levels will be. In the future, all patients should discontinue PPI use in order to obtain a reliable CgA level, irrespective of tumour activity or duration of PPI use. In our study population, there was no difference in CgA (percentage) decrease between patients who stopped acid inhibition completely and patients who replaced their PPI by H2RA. The use of H2RA did not affect the CgA levels, in contrast to PPI use. Proton pump inhibitor is a therapy that almost completely suppresses gastric acid. This is achieved by influencing the enzyme H+/K+-ATP-ase of the parietal cells (gastric proton pump). This acid suppression leads to an increase of gastrin, which is a trophic factor for hyperplasia of ECL cells. Apparently, the use of H2RA did not cause such hyperplasia of the ECL cells in this group of patients that it may lead to an increase of CgA. Although our H2RA group is relatively small, this finding confirms the results of Driman ) who reported increased parietal cell height, mass and number in omeprazole-treated patients compared with ranitidine-treated patients. In conclusion, we recommend to cease or replace PPI by H2RA, to obtain a reliable value of CgA. A discontinuation of 2 weeks is usually sufficient.
  12 in total

1.  Biological variation of plasma chromogranin A.

Authors:  Ruggero Dittadi; Sabrina Meo; Massimo Gion
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: biochemical markers.

Authors:  Dermot O'Toole; Ashley Grossman; David Gross; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Jaroslava Barkmanova; Juan O'Connor; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Ursula Plöckinger
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.914

3.  Chromogranin A measurement in metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: screening for false positives and a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Delphine Vezzosi; Thomas Walter; Agnès Laplanche; Jean Luc Raoul; Clarisse Dromain; Philippe Ruszniewski; Michèle d'Herbomez; Joël Guigay; Emmanuel Mitry; Guillaume Cadiot; Sophie Leboulleux; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Michel Ducreux; Eric Baudin
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.659

4.  Omeprazole produces parietal cell hypertrophy and hyperplasia in humans.

Authors:  D K Driman; C Wright; G Tougas; R H Riddell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Relationship between renal function and blood level of chromogranin A.

Authors:  G Tramonti; M Ferdeghini; C Annichiarico; M Norpoth; C Donadio; R Bianchi; C Bianchi
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2001 May-Jul       Impact factor: 2.606

6.  Serum gastrin and chromogranin A during medium- and long-term acid suppressive therapy: a case-control study.

Authors:  S Sanduleanu; M Stridsberg; D Jonkers; W Hameeteman; I Biemond; G Lundqvist; C Lamers; R W Stockbrügger
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 7.  Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism.

Authors:  Zeruesenay Desta; Xiaojiong Zhao; Jae-Gook Shin; David A Flockhart
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Chromogranin A as an alternative to 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in the evaluation of symptoms during treatment of patients with neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Catharina M Korse; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Neil K Aaronson; Augustinus A M Hart; Babs G Taal
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.914

9.  Effect of short-term treatment with low dosages of the proton-pump inhibitor omeprazole on serum chromogranin A levels in man.

Authors:  Massimo Giusti; Marilena Sidoti; Clara Augeri; Carla Rabitti; Francesco Minuto
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.664

10.  A new human chromogranin A (CgA) immunoradiometric assay involving monoclonal antibodies raised against the unprocessed central domain (145-245).

Authors:  F Degorce; Y Goumon; L Jacquemart; C Vidaud; L Bellanger; D Pons-Anicet; P Seguin; M H Metz-Boutigue; D Aunis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Chromogranin A is not a biomarker of mastocytosis.

Authors:  Pahul Hanjra; Chyi-Chia R Lee; Irina Maric; Melody Carter; Ana Olivera; Dean D Metcalfe; Hirsh D Komarow
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2017-10-13

2.  Predictive Value of Chromogranin A and a Pre-Operative Risk Score to Predict Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Alexander V Fisher; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; Victoria R Rendell; Courtney Pokrzywa; Flavio G Rocha; Zaheer S Kanji; George A Poultsides; Eleftherios A Makris; Mary E Dillhoff; Eliza W Beal; Ryan C Fields; Roheena Z Panni; Kamran Idrees; Paula Marincola Smith; Clifford S Cho; Megan V Beems; Shishir K Maithel; Emily R Winslow; Daniel E Abbott; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in Japan.

Authors:  Tetsuhide Ito; Susumu Hijioka; Toshihiko Masui; Atsuko Kasajima; Yuji Nakamoto; Noritoshi Kobayashi; Izumi Komoto; Masayuki Hijioka; Lingaku Lee; Hisato Igarashi; Robert Thomas Jensen; Masayuki Imamura
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Utility of chromogranin B compared with chromogranin A as a biomarker in Japanese patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Masami Miki; Tetsuhide Ito; Masayuki Hijioka; Lingaku Lee; Kohei Yasunaga; Keijiro Ueda; Takashi Fujiyama; Yuichi Tachibana; Ken Kawabe; Robert T Jensen; Yoshihiro Ogawa
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AME) position statement: a stepwise clinical approach to the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Franco Grimaldi; Nicola Fazio; Roberto Attanasio; Andrea Frasoldati; Enrico Papini; Francesco Angelini; Roberto Baldelli; Debora Berretti; Sara Bianchetti; Giancarlo Bizzarri; Marco Caputo; Roberto Castello; Nadia Cremonini; Anna Crescenzi; Maria Vittoria Davì; Angela Valentina D'Elia; Antongiulio Faggiano; Stefano Pizzolitto; Annibale Versari; Michele Zini; Guido Rindi; Kjell Oberg
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Serum chromogranin-A-based prognosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karthik V Giridhar; Cristobal Sanhueza; David W Hillman; Hassan Alkhateeb; Rachel Carlson; Winston Tan; Brian A Costello; Fernando Quevedo; Lance Pagliaro; Manish Kohli
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 7.  Circulating Neuroendocrine Tumor Biomarkers: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Paweł Komarnicki; Jan Musiałkiewicz; Alicja Stańska; Adam Maciejewski; Paweł Gut; George Mastorakos; Marek Ruchała
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  The association of a panel of biomarkers with the presence and severity of carcinoid heart disease: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rebecca Dobson; Malcolm I Burgess; Melissa Banks; D Mark Pritchard; Jiten Vora; Juan W Valle; Christopher Wong; Carrie Chadwick; Keith George; Brian Keevil; Joanne Adaway; Joy E S Ardill; Alan Anthoney; Uschi Hofmann; Graeme J Poston; Daniel J Cuthbertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Serum chromogranin A is a useful marker for Japanese patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Masayuki Hijioka; Tetsuhide Ito; Hisato Igarashi; Nao Fujimori; Lingaku Lee; Taichi Nakamura; Robert T Jensen; Ryoichi Takayanagi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 6.716

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.