Literature DB >> 21989151

Perineural ultrasound-guided catheter bacterial colonization: a prospective evaluation in 747 cases.

Christophe Aveline1, Hubert Le Hetet, Alain Le Roux, Pierre Vautier, Jean François Gautier, Fabrice Cognet, Philippe Auger, Francis Bonnet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound guidance is increasingly used for catheter insertion and could make it more complicated to guarantee aseptic insertion of catheters. The current study evaluated the incidence of colonization of ultrasound-guided perineural catheter (US-PNC) placed for postoperative analgesia.
METHODS: We evaluated prospectively for 14 months 760 ultrasound-guided catheters in a single center placed under sterile conditions. Quantitative culture of all the catheters was performed after withdrawal. Colonization was defined as ≥10(3) colony-forming units/mL. Infection was defined as the isolation of the same microorganism from the colonized catheter and from blood culture and/or culture of an abscess. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent risk factors of US-PNC colonization.
RESULTS: Incidences of colonization and infections were 10.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 8.2%-14.4%) and 0.13% (95% CI, 0%-3.8%), respectively, in a total of 747 catheters. Coagulase-negative staphylococci colonization was documented in 69% of the colonized catheters. Local inflammation was more frequently noted when catheters were colonized (26.9% [95% CI, 15.2%-38.7%] versus 8.1% [95% CI, 4.2%-11.9%], P = 0.005). Independent factors for ultrasound-guided catheter colonization were duration of catheter placement more than 48 hours (odds ratio [OR], 4.9; 95% CI, 1.1-12.7; P = 0.003), diabetes (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-9.6; P = 0.004), and antibiotic administration during the month preceding surgery (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-7.8; P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Although infection rate is low, there is a risk of ultrasound-guided catheter colonization that deserves careful monitoring of the insertion site in the postoperative period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21989151     DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31822e665a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  5 in total

1.  [Regional anesthesia for patients with infections or immunosuppression: risk-benefit assessment].

Authors:  J Büttner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Adding dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine for lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block for amputation of lower limb in high-risk patient-a case report.

Authors:  Chun-Guang Wang; Yan-Ling Ding; Ai-Ping Han; Chang-Qing Hu; Shi Hao; Fang-Fang Zhang; Yong-Wang Li; Hu Liu; Zhe Han; De-Li Guo; Zhi-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

3.  Use of a chlorhexidine-impregnated patch does not decrease the incidence of bacterial colonization of femoral nerve catheters: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Kristopher M Schroeder; Robert A Jacobs; Christopher Guite; Kyle Gassner; Brooke Anderson; Melanie J Donnelly
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  The role of continuous peripheral nerve blocks.

Authors:  José Aguirre; Alicia Del Moral; Irina Cobo; Alain Borgeat; Stephan Blumenthal
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-18

5.  Comparative Evaluation of Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine with Dexamethasone in Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Lower Abdominal Surgeries: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study.

Authors:  N Gnanasekar; G Dilip Kumar; Pranjali Kurhekar; M S Raghuraman; T Krishna Prasad
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.