Literature DB >> 21988827

Touch to see: neuropsychological evidence of a sensory mirror system for touch.

Nadia Bolognini1, Elena Olgiati, Annalisa Xaiz, Lucio Posteraro, Francesco Ferraro, Angelo Maravita.   

Abstract

The observation of touch can be grounded in the activation of brain areas underpinning direct tactile experience, namely the somatosensory cortices. What is the behavioral impact of such a mirror sensory activity on visual perception? To address this issue, we investigated the causal interplay between observed and felt touch in right brain-damaged patients, as a function of their underlying damaged visual and/or tactile modalities. Patients and healthy controls underwent a detection task, comprising visual stimuli depicting touches or without a tactile component. Touch and No-touch stimuli were presented in egocentric or allocentric perspectives. Seeing touches, regardless of the viewing perspective, differently affects visual perception depending on which sensory modality is damaged: In patients with a selective visual deficit, but without any tactile defect, the sight of touch improves the visual impairment; this effect is associated with a lesion to the supramarginal gyrus. In patients with a tactile deficit, but intact visual perception, the sight of touch disrupts visual processing, inducing a visual extinction-like phenomenon. This disruptive effect is associated with the damage of the postcentral gyrus. Hence, a damage to the somatosensory system can lead to a dysfunctional visual processing, and an intact somatosensory processing can aid visual perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21988827     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  8 in total

Review 1.  Common coding and dynamic interactions between observed, imagined, and experienced motor and somatosensory activity.

Authors:  Laura K Case; Jaime Pineda; Vilayanur S Ramachandran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 2.  Multisensory-Based Rehabilitation Approach: Translational Insights from Animal Models to Early Intervention.

Authors:  Giulia Purpura; Giovanni Cioni; Francesca Tinelli
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 3.  Inter-lateral Referral of Sensation in Health and Disease Using a Mirror Illusion-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Annegret Hagenberg; Dave G Lambert; Shifa Jussab; John Maltby; Thompson G Robinson
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.448

4.  Mirror-like brain responses to observed touch and personality dimensions.

Authors:  Michael Schaefer; Michael Rotte; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Claudia Denke
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Vicarious motor activation during action perception: beyond correlational evidence.

Authors:  Alessio Avenanti; Matteo Candidi; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Close to you: embodied simulation for peripersonal space in primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Schaefer; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Michael Rotte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Seeing Touches Early in Life.

Authors:  Margaret Addabbo; Elena Longhi; Nadia Bolognini; Irene Senna; Paolo Tagliabue; Viola Macchi Cassia; Chiara Turati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differences in Early Stages of Tactile ERP Temporal Sequence (P100) in Cortical Organization during Passive Tactile Stimulation in Children with Blindness and Controls.

Authors:  Tomás Ortiz Alonso; Juan Matías Santos; Laura Ortiz Terán; Mayelin Borrego Hernández; Joaquín Poch Broto; Gabriel Alejandro de Erausquin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.