Literature DB >> 21988657

Leaving the paediatric emergency department without being seen: understanding the patient and the risks.

Yvonne Ng1, Stuart Lewena.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study is to examine the left-without-being-seen (LWBS) patient population of a tertiary paediatric emergency department (ED) to provide quality assurance and risk management data.
METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of patients who LWBS after presenting to the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne ED between July and November 2005. Information was collected from electronic databases and follow-up telephone interviews performed by the principal investigator 3-5 days after the presentation.
RESULTS: Over the 17-week study period, 7.6% of attendances were recorded as having LWBS. These patients and their presentations resembled the general ED population in many respects. However, there were several significant differences, particularly in relation to age, insurance status, mode of arrival, referral status, arrival time and illness severity. Most families (74%) indicated they would have been equally happy to visit a general practitioner instead had one been available. Prolonged waiting times and recognition that their child's illness was not severe were the most frequent reasons for leaving. Most parents subsequently accessed alternate health care or were planning to do so, and the majority stated their child's illness was improving. Parents maintained a surprisingly positive attitude to their ED presentation.
CONCLUSION: The individual risks associated with leaving the ED before a child has been medically assessed are small. However, when multiplied several thousandfold as a function of the frequency of LWBS patients, the chance of serious adverse events becomes real. Potential risk management strategies include decreasing absolute LWBS numbers by addressing ED overcrowding and providing alternate sources for non-urgent care.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health © 2011 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21988657     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02187.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1034-4810            Impact factor:   1.954


  6 in total

1.  The burden of inappropriate emergency department pediatric visits: why Italy needs an urgent reform.

Authors:  Alessio Vedovetto; Nicola Soriani; Emanuela Merlo; Dario Gregori
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Suitability of emergency department attenders to be assessed in primary care: survey of general practitioner agreement in a random sample of triage records analysed in a service evaluation project.

Authors:  Mary I W Thompson; Daniel Lasserson; Lloyd McCann; Matthew Thompson; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Marginal analysis in assessing factors contributing time to physician in the Emergency Department using operations data.

Authors:  Sameer A Pathan; Zain A Bhutta; Jibin Moinudheen; Dominic Jenkins; Ashwin D Silva; Yogdutt Sharma; Warda A Saleh; Zeenat Khudabakhsh; Furqan B Irfan; Stephen H Thomas
Journal:  Qatar Med J       Date:  2017-02-24

4.  Early quick acuity score provides more complete data on emergency department walkouts.

Authors:  Paris B Lovett; J Akiva Kahn; Stuart E Greene; Matthew A Bloch; Daniel R Brandt; Michael R Minckler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Identifying Patient Door-to-Room Goals to Minimize Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates.

Authors:  Shea Pielsticker; Lori Whelan; Annette O Arthur; Stephen Thomas
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-20

6.  Dedicated Pediatricians in Emergency Department: Shorter Waiting Times and Lower Costs.

Authors:  Manuel Rocha Melo; Manuel Ferreira-Magalhães; Filipa Flor-Lima; Mariana Rodrigues; Milton Severo; Luis Almeida-Santos; Alberto Caldas-Afonso; Pedro Pita Barros; António Ferreira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.